Published online March 1, 2005
PEDIATRICS Vol. 115 No. 3 March 2005, pp. 831 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2871)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Austin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Austin, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

Rethinking the Rethinking About "Well-Child" Care

Glenn Austin, MD, FAAP
Beaverton, OR 97007

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Dr Schor's call for "a single authoritative source of standards for well-child care"1 has stirred considerable angst and soul searching about primary care pediatrics in both the academic and private sectors. Half a century ago, Dr Ed Shaw, Chair of Pediatrics at the University of California San Francisco, discussed the concept of well-child care at a local meeting. His basic premise was that we needed to get the children into the office so that, "among other things," they would get their immunizations; thus, the genesis of the "well-child visits." The issue has . . . [Full Text of this Article]