This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slovis, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slovis, T. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Radiology
PEDIATRICS Vol. 112 No. 4 October 2003, pp. 971-972

COMMENTARY

Children, Computed Tomography Radiation Dose, and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Concept

Thomas L. Slovis, MD

Department of Pediatric Imaging, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI 48201-2196

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography • ALARA, As Low As Reasonably Achievable

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

It is apparent that without extrapolation or animal experimentation, low-dose radiation has a small but statistically significant individual risk of excessive cancer over a child’s lifetime.1–3 This data was recently published as part of the ongoing, >50-year study of the survivors of the atomic bomb that cost $500 million. The kind of radiation and doses these individuals were exposed to is similar to that from computed tomography (CT) (Fig 1). The total body effect of the A-bomb versus the more localized effect of medical radiation makes little difference on the outcome. Figure 2 is an explanation of terminology of the radiation doses used. There is clearly an overlap between the CT doses currently used and the low doses that the atomic bomb survivors received.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig 1. Relevant dose range for pediatric CT: 6 to 100 mSv (0.006–0.1 Sv). From Brenner DJ. Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to . . . [Full Text of this Article]

 
Address correspondence to Thomas L. Slovis MD, Department of Pediatric Imaging, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, 3901 Beaubien Blvd, Detroit, MI 48201-2196. E-mail: tslovis@med.wayne.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 radtechHome page
J. Hughes
CT: Radiation Overdose?
Radiol. Technol., September 1, 2008; 80(1): 92 - 94.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. L. Hollingsworth, T. T. Yoshizumi, D. P. Frush, F. P. Chan, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, C. R. Lowry, and L. M. Hurwitz
Pediatric Cardiac-Gated CT Angiography: Assessment of Radiation Dose
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 12 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
P Rouas, Y Delbos, and J Nancy
Pseudo multiple and enlarged mandibular canals: the evidence-based response of cone beam computed tomography.
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 217 - 218.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
N. R. Fefferman, E. Bomsztyk, A. M. Yim, R. Rivera, J. B. Amodio, L. P. Pinkney, N. A. Strubel, M. E. Noz, and H. Rusinek
Appendicitis in Children: Low-Dose CT with a Phantom-based Simulation Technique--Initial Observations
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 641 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Zhu, J. Yu, and Z. Huang
Low-Dose Chest CT: Optimizing Radiation Protection for Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 809 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. G. Benz and M. W. Benz
Reduction of Cancer Risk Associated With Pediatric Computed Tomography by the Development of New Technologies
Pediatrics, July 1, 2004; 114(1): 205 - 209.
[Full Text] [PDF]