SPECIAL ARTICLE |




* Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Lucile Packard Childrens Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Medicine, Childrens Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Education, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois
Abbreviations: CME, continuing medical education AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics CPD, continuous professional development ABP, American Board of Pediatrics
| The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
Criticism exists that the current structure of CME may be ineffective in altering physician performance with its distant, disconnected, and teacher-centered approach to education.18 In a systematic review of the usefulness of CME strategies, Davis et al6 found that CME in North America is concentrated mostly in formal interventions (eg, conferences) that have limited impact in changing physician performance and/or health care outcomes. They attribute this ineffectiveness in part to the fact that most CME strategies are not individualized to the physician-learner.6 Physicians are expected to learn specific knowledge and skills presented in different formats by experts and then to incorporate this learning into their own practices at a later time. Content in CME activities, especially delivered by lectures, often is not immediately relevant to a participants clinical practice. Evidence has shown that if the new knowledge is not directly relevant to the physician, then it is less likely that he or she will be able to integrate it in a way that ultimately enhances patient outcomes.2 There are important aspects to CME that may have value for participants, including confirmation of medical knowledge and reinforcement of good clinical practice.
The methods to obtain CME chosen by practitioners are also shifting, as constraints of time and money are becoming increasingly influential in determining CME preferences. As clinical productivity demands have increased, physicians have found less
Reprint requests to (T.C.S.) Lucile Packard Childrens Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, 725 Welch Rd #5731, Palo Alto, CA 94304. E-mail: theodore.sectish@medcenter.stanford.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Izatt Educational Perspectives: Portfolios: The Next Assessment Tool in Medical Education? NeoReviews, October 1, 2007; 8(10): e405 - e408. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kind, J. T. Benjamin, J. Parboosingh, E. Rothstein, R. Perelman, M. C. Badat, and H. Bernstein Learning in Practice and Maintaining Certification in Pediatrics Pediatr. Rev., May 1, 2007; 28(5): e23 - e29. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Sectish, E. L. Zalneraitis, C. Carraccio, and R. E. Behrman The State of Pediatrics Residency Training: A Period of Transformation of Graduate Medical Education Pediatrics, September 1, 2004; 114(3): 832 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Dougherty and L. A. Simpson Measuring the Quality of Children's Health Care: A Prerequisite to Action Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1/S1): 185 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||