This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sectish, T. C. Articles by Bernstein, H. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sectish, T. C. Articles by Bernstein, H. H. Related Collections Office Practice Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Continuous Professional Development: Raising the Bar for Pediatricians

Theodore C. Sectish, MD^*, Victoria Floriani, BA, Mary Carol Badat, MAdEd, Robert Perelman, MD and Henry H. Bernstein, DO

^* Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Education, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois

Abbreviations: CME, continuing medical education • AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics • CPD, continuous professional development • ABP, American Board of Pediatrics

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

	INTRODUCTION

 
Physicians are increasingly accountable to patients and institutions for proof that they are maintaining medical competence in a rapidly changing health care environment.¹ An essential factor in the professional development of physicians is a lifelong commitment to learning. Changes in clinical practice and advances in research have created new educational needs for physicians during the past 2 decades. Coupled with expanded learning methodologies, these needs have prompted unique approaches to traditional continuing medical education (CME).

Criticism exists that the current structure of CME may be ineffective in altering physician performance with its distant, disconnected, and teacher-centered approach to education.^1–8 In a systematic review of the usefulness of CME strategies, Davis et al⁶ found that CME in North America is concentrated mostly in formal interventions (eg, conferences) that have limited impact in changing physician performance and/or health care outcomes. They attribute this ineffectiveness in part to the fact that most CME strategies are not individualized to the physician-learner.⁶ Physicians are expected to learn specific knowledge and skills presented in different formats by experts and then to incorporate this learning into their own practices at a later time. Content in CME activities, especially delivered by lectures, often is not immediately relevant to a participant’s clinical practice. Evidence has shown that if the new knowledge is not directly relevant to the physician, then it is less likely that he or she will be able to integrate it in a way that ultimately enhances patient outcomes.² There are important aspects to CME that may have value for participants, including confirmation of medical knowledge and reinforcement of good clinical practice.

The methods to obtain CME chosen by practitioners are also shifting, as constraints of time and money are becoming increasingly influential in determining CME preferences. As clinical productivity demands have increased, physicians have found less . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Reprint requests to (T.C.S.) Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, 725 Welch Rd #5731, Palo Alto, CA 94304. E-mail: theodore.sectish@medcenter.stanford.edu

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Izatt Educational Perspectives: Portfolios: The Next Assessment Tool in Medical Education? NeoReviews, October 1, 2007; 8(10): e405 - e408. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kind, J. T. Benjamin, J. Parboosingh, E. Rothstein, R. Perelman, M. C. Badat, and H. Bernstein Learning in Practice and Maintaining Certification in Pediatrics Pediatr. Rev., May 1, 2007; 28(5): e23 - e29. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. Sectish, E. L. Zalneraitis, C. Carraccio, and R. E. Behrman The State of Pediatrics Residency Training: A Period of Transformation of Graduate Medical Education Pediatrics, September 1, 2004; 114(3): 832 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Dougherty and L. A. Simpson Measuring the Quality of Children's Health Care: A Prerequisite to Action Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1/S1): 185 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]