This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binns, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binns, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 6 December 2001, pp. 1364-1366

COMMENTARY

Targeted Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels: Populations at High Risk

Abbreviations: NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Lead poisoning is a preventable environmental disease without borders, affecting children worldwide. Currently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines an elevated blood level to be 10 µg/dL or greater.1 The most recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999 data demonstrated that the geometric mean blood lead level in the United States has decreased to 2 µg/dL.2 That report did not present prevalence data because of small numbers. Despite the lowering of blood lead levels nationally, complacency about lead poisoning is not indicated. An analysis of childhood blood lead data collected by state surveillance programs found that prevalence of elevated blood lead levels varied from state to state and county to county, indicating that lead poisoning is still a problem at the local level.2

Additionally, data suggests that there may be effects of lead on cognitive ability at levels lower than previously reported.3 Other data suggests that standard application of chelation therapy did not improve neuropsychological function in lead-poisoned children.4 These data point out the need for improved prevention efforts, specifically, a shift to primary prevention through improved housing paired with continued, vigilant blood lead screening among populations at risk.

. . . [Full Text of this Article]

Helen J. Binns, MD, MPH

Chicago, IL

Dennis Kim, MD, MPH

Atlanta, GA

Carla Campbell, MD, MS

for the Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention
Department of Health and Human Services
Philadelphia, PA

Address correspondence to Helen J. Binns, MD, MPH, Children’s Memorial Hospital, 2300 Children’s Plaza, #208, Chicago, IL 60614




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
T. A. Dignam, A. Evens, E. Eduardo, S. M. Ramirez, K. L. Caldwell, N. Kilpatrick, G. P. Noonan, W. D. Flanders, P. A. Meyer, and M. A. McGeehin
High-Intensity Targeted Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels Among Children in 2 Inner-City Chicago Communities
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2004; 94(11): 1945 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
S. M. Bernard
Should the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Childhood Lead Poisoning Intervention Level Be Lowered?
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2003; 93(8): 1253 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
W. O. Robertson, D. Kim, H. J. Binns, and C. Campbell
Blood Lead Levels
Pediatrics, July 1, 2002; 110(1): 196 - 196.
[Full Text] [PDF]