This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Behrman, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Behrman, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 3 March 2001, pp. 553-557

SPECIAL ARTICLE:
Postgraduate Education for Pediatricians

Richard E. Behrman, MD

From the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health and the Departments of Pediatrics of Stanford University, Stanford, California and the University of California, San Francisco, California.

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.



    ARTICLE

Thank you very much for inviting me to start off the discussions today on postgraduate medical education. Historically, postgraduate education has always been grounded in the perception of the specific health care needs of patients. Therefore, I'm first going to address some of the more important health care needs of children, emphasizing the unmet needs which future pediatricians must be prepared to meet. Then I'd like to move on from these discrete problems to several very difficult fundamental challenges that cut across rotations and the residency years. There is a saying attributed to Mark Twain that might well have been directed to us as educators. "It is noble to teach oneself; it is still nobler to teach others---and a lot more trouble."1 These cross-cutting challenges are a lot of trouble to address.

But to begin, let's consider the health needs of children. Many groups of children deserve attention; however, 6 subsets, in particular, stand out. I'm going to comment briefly on each of these from the perspective of residency training.

First, there are those children and youth requiring hospitalization for high levels of care. The numbers of children and youth receiving tertiary and quartinary care have been relatively stable for several years.2 It is unlikely that the number of acute hospital days of care for these children will increase. The trend to diagnose and treat more and more of these children in ambulatory settings is likely to offset the introduction of new hospital-based diagnostic and treatment modalities.

These patients are usually the recipients of the mainstream of direct services and research provided by the faculties of academic pediatric departments and, not surprisingly, academic departments across the country care for a large proportion of this total group. Participation in the care of these children also constitutes a major part of the . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
V. B. Gupta, K. G. O'Connor, and C. Quezada-Gomez
Care Coordination Services in Pediatric Practices
Pediatrics, May 1, 2004; 113(5/S1): 1517 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
E. J. Cullen Jr, S. T. Lawless, J. H. Hertzog, S. Penfil, K. K. Bradford, V. M. Nadkarni, D. H. Corddry, and A. T. Costarino Jr
A Model of Determining a Fair Market Value for Teaching Residents: Who Profits?
Pediatrics, July 1, 2003; 112(1): 40 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]