PEDIATRICS Vol. 106 No. 6 December 2000, pp. 1520-1524
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To the Editor.
The recent article by Sills et al1 asks whether the
recent Milliman and Robertson (M&R) Health Status Improvement and
Management (HSIM) publication2 presents realistic
length-of-stay criteria. The article does not directly answer the
question posed. Faculty members in the Department of Pediatrics at the
University of Texas at Houston provided contributions to the M&R HSIM,
with the intention as stated by the authors "of focusing on best
practice rather than median performance." Even with best practice in
mind, inspection of the histograms presented in Fig 1 demonstrates that
the goal LOS was in fact modal in at least half of the 16 diagnoses.
Reanalysis of the published data (Table
1) shows that the average of the
"percentage of patients with LOS > M&R" for the 16 diagnoses equals 63%; thus, on average, 37% were discharged on or before the
M&R
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. M. Kini, J. M. Robbins, M. S. Kirschbaum, S. J. Frisbee, U. R. Kotagal, and for the Child Health Accountability Initiative Inpatient Care for Uncomplicated Bronchiolitis: Comparison With Milliman and Robertson Guidelines Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2001; 155(12): 1323 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||