This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aggett, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aggett, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nutrition & Metabolism

PEDIATRICS Vol. 106 No. 5 Supplement November 2000, pp. 1271

Research Priorities in Complementary Feeding: International Paediatric Association (IPA) and European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Workshop

Peter J. Aggett, MB, ChB

Lancashire Postgraduate School of Medicine and Health University of Central Lancashire Preston, United Kingdom

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

    I. INTRODUCTION AND COMMENTARY

This workshop was convened jointly by The International Paediatric Association and the Committee on Nutrition of the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition in Casablanca, Morocco, August 26-28, 1999. Its aim was to explore the research issues and questions that would need to be addressed to improve the understanding and practice of complementary feeding.

Each contributor was asked to review briefly a specific topic, and to identify the research which, in his or her opinion, was needed to optimize complementary feeding in infancy. Current guidelines and practices were reviewed, but it was appreciated that because the evidence base is limited, current guidelines are to some extent arbitrary. There is a need to be constantly aware of this and to share this uncertainty with caregivers and policymakers, lest undue credence is placed in the current guidelines. Guidelines will adapt as more evidence becomes available and they will become less dependent on accepted practices.

Probably the biggest debate centers on the best time to introduce complementary feeds, and on the nature of these feeds. Most, if not all, guidelines recommend exclusive breastfeeding until at least 4 months. Even so, many mothers, including those in populations that epitomize ideal breastfeeding by maintaining it into the second year of life, give infants solids as early as 2 months. Of particular concern in the timing, and the amount, of exposure to complementary foods are issues relating to immune function, the acquisition of immunotolerance, and functional imprinting of intestinal function, its microflora, and of systemic metabolism. The main debate over timing is if it should be about 6 months, or at 4 to 6 months.

. . . [Full Text of this Article]