This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauchner, H.
Right arrow Articles by Chessare, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauchner, H.
Right arrow Articles by Chessare, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 4 April 2000, pp. 858-859

COMMENTARY:
Milliman and Robertson---Going in the Wrong Direction

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The Milliman and Robertson guide has created a great deal of consternation among pediatricians, particularly the sections that address optimal length of stay for common pediatric conditions. In his accompanying commentary,1 Dr Yetman introduces the new version of the Pediatric Health Status Improvement and Management2 and carefully enumerates its strengths. Although management guidelines play an important role in medicine, we believe that there are a number of important limitations that must be recognized in this revision.

Before authoring this commentary, we carefully reviewed the entire Milliman and Robertson document, noting both its strengths and weaknesses. Our comments reflect our review, discussions with pediatricians, and our clinical experience with how the Milliman and Robertson recommendations are often applied. It should be noted that in the introduction to each section, the authors carefully allude to the importance of individual patient and practitioner decision-making. Although the sections on subspecialty pediatrics, anticipatory guidance, and outpatient guidelines (their term) are well done; from a practical standpoint, the sections on inpatient guidelines and neonatology (including optimal length of stay) garner the most attention, especially when these . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
N. M. Kini, J. M. Robbins, M. S. Kirschbaum, S. J. Frisbee, U. R. Kotagal, and for the Child Health Accountability Initiative
Inpatient Care for Uncomplicated Bronchiolitis: Comparison With Milliman and Robertson Guidelines
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2001; 155(12): 1323 - 1327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. S. Harman and K. J. Kelleher
Pediatric Length of Stay Guidelines and Routine Practice: The Case of Milliman and Robertson
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 2001; 155(8): 885 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. W. Sparks;, J. M. Goldenring;, J. Schibanoff, R. L. Liliedahl;, E. O. Cox;, T. G. Cleary;, and J. W. Sparks
The Milliman-Robertson Length of Stay Debate
Pediatrics, December 1, 2000; 106(6): 1520 - 1524.
[Full Text]