This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berman, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Hepatitis B

PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 3 March 2000, pp. 638-640

COMMENTARY:
Child Health Policymaking

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) seeks to improve the health and well-being of America's children, in part, by formulating well-designed child health policy statements. The development of child health policy statements should always consider 4 key principles: integrity, credibility, fairness, and responsibility. A recent example of the child health policymaking process of the AAP was the joint statement of the AAP and US Public Health Service on the use of a mercury-containing preservative called thimerosal in vaccines and recommendations for hepatitis B vaccine administration. The perceived need to address the thimerosal issue quickly to provide pediatricians with timely recommendations precluded an extensive inclusive policymaking process. The process used demonstrates that the AAP, the US Public Health Service and other public agencies, and experts from academia can respond quickly and work together in the best interests of our children. This commentary will reflect on how the child health policymaking process of the AAP tried to consider these 4 key principles in its deliberations and understand the possible implications of alternative policy options.

The principle of integrity involves the need to gain as complete an understanding of the issue as possible and communicate an unbiased assessment, acknowledging both what is known and not known. The AAP sought to maintain the integrity of the process by presenting the available information to pediatricians in as impartial and intellectually honest way as possible. The AAP became . . . [Full Text of this Article]