This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkland, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkland, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 104 No. 3 September 1999, pp. 577

Read This---It's Important

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

To the Editor.

The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Editorial Panel of the American Medical Association recently issued its 1999 revisions. This revised edition included the input of numerous medical specialties. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) agreed previously with the use of the CPT codes and the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) physician fee schedule, but emphasized a need to rectify the inequities of the CPT and RBRVS system.1 The AAP also filed recently an amicus curiae brief with the US District Court for the northern . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?