PEDIATRICS Vol. 103 No. 6 Supplement June 1999, pp. 1353-1358
Instruction, Timeliness, and Medical Influences Affecting Toilet Training
,
,
From the * Children's Hospital, Camarrity, Massachusetts;
Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri; § Nell Hodgson
Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
Massachusetts Caring for Children Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts;
¶ Poole Pediatrics, Raleigh, North Carolina; # Children's Hospital,
Touchpoint Project, Boston, Massachusetts; and ** The Growing Child,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
| The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Contemporary toilet training derives from two accepted models: child-oriented gradual training and structured-behavioral, endpoint-oriented training. The former approach views toilet training as a process by which a parent systematically responds to a child's signals of toilet "readiness," whereas the latter views toilet training as a process of eliciting a specific chain of independent toileting behaviors. Practically speaking, contemporary theoretic constructs of toileting behavior diverge with respect to training endpoints (ie, defined differently or deemphasized altogether), emphasis on self-esteem, development of goals, and timing of initiation. A scientific basis cannot be established for a universal timeline for toilet training, because each method has its own definition of the toilet training process. It remains unclear, for example, how long children must remain bowel- and bladder-continent to be considered trained, and to what extent children should be able to toilet themselves independently of caregivers.1
Both child-oriented gradual and structured-behavioral approaches to toilet training evolved in the United States during the past 40 years within a scientific milieu that came to accept toilet training as a developmental milestone requiring a child's active participation. This common view of toilet training as a developmental process has provided clinically useful overlapping concepts of mature toileting behavior. The child-oriented gradual method, proposed by T. Berry Brazelton in 1962, defined the parameters of toilet readiness; a decade later, N.H. Azrin and R.M. Foxx designed a structured-behavioral method that detailed the components of independent toileting. Widespread acceptance of readiness and independent toileting have since been supported by clinical experience and resulted in agreement that a child should be ready to participate in toilet training at approximately 18 months of age and be trained completely by 2 or 3 years old. Global trends continue to support this concept despite technologic advancements and conveniences such as diapers, which have enabled delayed training.
Toilet readiness is a powerful conceptual
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Joinson, J. Heron, A. von Gontard, U. Butler, J. Golding, and A. Emond Early Childhood Risk Factors Associated with Daytime Wetting and Soiling in School-age Children J. Pediatr. Psychol., August 1, 2008; 33(7): 739 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schonwald, L. Sherritt, A. Stadtler, and C. Bridgemohan Factors Associated With Difficult Toilet Training Pediatrics, June 1, 2004; 113(6): 1753 - 1757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Christophersen The Case for Evidence-Based Toilet Training Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2003; 157(12): 1153 - 1154. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bethell, C. Peck, and E. Schor Assessing Health System Provision of Well-Child Care: The Promoting Healthy Development Survey Pediatrics, May 1, 2001; 107(5): 1084 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||







