This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauchner, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauchner, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 103 No. 5 May 1999, pp. 1029-1031

COMMENTARY:
Evidence-based Medicine: A New Science or an Epidemiologic Fad?

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been defined as the "conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The practice of evidence-based medicine means integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research."1 It has been championed by many groups, particularly in Canada and England, as one way to address issues related to quality of care.2-9 More specifically, EBM reflects a concerted effort to systematically retrieve and synthesize data, make the data available to physicians, and incorporate it into practice.10 Intuition and individual clinical experience are deemphasized and decision-making based on evidence is stressed. Although there have been some concerns about whether there is sufficient evidence to guide many of our clinical decisions, about what represents the best available evidence, and about the authoritarian voices of the EBM movement, it should be our goal to make the most informed medical decisions on behalf of patients.11-13

Why is EBM important? Is it just another epidemiologic fad, one that will gradually fade into the sunset? EBM originates from the ongoing concerns about quality of care, including individual, institutional, and regional variations in diagnostic testing, hospitalization rates, therapeutic interventions, and outcomes.14,15 For example, in pediatrics, there are ample data indicating that the care of many children with asthma is not consistent with the guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) or the National Institutes of Health.15,16 In some regards, EBM represents the culmination of such methodologic approaches as decision analysis,17 meta-analysis,18-19 practice guidelines,20 clinical pathways,21 disease management,22-23 systematic reviews (Cochrane Collaboration),24-27 and critically appraised topics.28 In fact, EBM relies on all these methods, and they represent the traditional science of EBM.

. . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
I. Tien, D. Dorfman, B. Kastner, and H. Bauchner
Metered-Dose Inhaler: The Emergency Department Orphan
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2001; 155(12): 1335 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
H. BAUCHNER, L. SIMPSON, and J. CHESSARE
Changing physician behaviour
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2001; 84(6): 459 - 462.
[Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
G. M. Onady; and H. Bauchner
Evidence-Based Medicine
Pediatrics, May 1, 2000; 105(5): 1176 - 1177.
[Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
H. Bauchner, R. Vinci, and J. Chessare
Milliman and Robertson---Going in the Wrong Direction
Pediatrics, April 1, 2000; 105(4): 858 - 859.
[Full Text]