This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albanyan, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Albanyan, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, C. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity

PEDIATRICS Vol. 102 No. 4 October 1998, pp. 984-985

EXPERIENCE AND REASON:
Is Lumbar Puncture Necessary to Exclude Meningitis in Neonates and Young Infants: Lessons From the Group B Streptococcus Cellulitis-Adenitis Syndrome

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Cellulitis-adenitis syndrome is an established but uncommon presentation of group B streptococcus (GBS) infection in neonates and young infants.1,2 The pathogenesis involves either GBS mucus membrane colonization with subsequent bacteremia and seeding of the soft tissues, or in the context of GBS facial cellulitis, ipsilateral otitis media with secondary lymphatic spread and ensuing bacteremia.2,3 While meningitis accompanying cellulitis or adenitis in young infants occurs, it is described as rare.4 Because cellulitis-adenitis is an infrequent manifestation of GBS disease during infancy, the incidence of associated central nervous system (CNS) involvement is unknown. Debate currently exists over the need for lumbar puncture in neonates in other clinical situations.5-8 In addition there is increasing use of algorithms to define the extent of evaluation needed for the infant with suspected bacterial infection. These issues raise concern that the lumbar puncture in the initial diagnostic evaluation may be overlooked. This is particularly significant for general pediatricians and emergency room physicians.

We present two neonates with GBS cellulitis-adenitis syndrome who were afebrile and well-appearing initially and were subsequently confirmed to have CNS involvement. Our purpose is to emphasize the importance of considering meningitis in the initial diagnostic evaluation. Our patients are reminders of the need to exclude CNS involvement in neonates and young infants with suspected bacterial infection (focal or nonfocal) because choice and dosage of empiric antimicrobial therapy in infants with meningitis varies from that for nonmeningeal infection.5

Case 1

A 14-day-old African-American female infant with a previously uncomplicated neonatal course presented with a 3-day history of right inguinal erythema and swelling. No fever or irritability was noted and she maintained a good appetite. An outpatient evaluation included a blood culture . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. T. Del Vecchio, E. R. Sundel, M. A. Benstock, K. Berger Sadow, and S. J. Teach
Choice of Antibiotics in Febrile Neonates
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2000; 154(2): 205 - 206.
[Full Text] [PDF]