This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by du Plessis, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by du Plessis, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 102 No. 4 October 1998, pp. 972-974

COMMENTARY:
Induced Mild Hypothermia: The Spearhead Strategy for Effective Neonatal Neuroprotection?

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Perinatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury remains one of the most desperate conditions in modern pediatric practice. The potentially devastating and lifelong consequences of this condition are accentuated by the frustrating impotence of current therapeutic options. In recent years remarkable experimental advances have elucidated many of the cellular and vascular mechanisms of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. This in turn has facilitated the design of rational, focused, and mechanism-based rescue therapies in animal models.1 Unfortunately, translation of this experimental progress to human clinical trial has been confined in large part to the adult stroke population, and has been slow to trickle down to the asphyxiated newborn infant. Perhaps the most exciting neuroprotective strategy to emerge from the laboratory in recent years has been the use of mild sustained hypothermia.2-12 In this month's issue, Gunn et al13 report promising data from a prospective trial of this technique in asphyxiated term infants. The feasibility and safety data reported in this randomized study support the advance of this technique toward larger-scale clinical trials in the human newborn with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

For decades, the pursuit of safe and effective neuroprotection for the asphyxiated newborn infant has been impeded by certain features intrinsic to both the insult (ie, hypoxia-ischemia/reperfusion [HI/R]) and the substrate (ie, the immature brain).1 The complex concatenation of cellular events triggered by a cerebral HI/R insult evolves rapidly through a series of amplifying cascades and eventually crosses the threshold of irreversible injury. Although our concepts of the reversibility of neuronal injury are changing, there is clearly a therapeutic window of opportunity beyond which intervention rapidly becomes ineffective.14 The second major constraint has been our ongoing inability to interrogate the neurologic well-being of the fetus, thereby delaying the diagnosis of cerebral HI/R insults and . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Iwata, J. W. Newburger, D. Zurakowski, and R. A. Jonas
Postoperative Hypothermia and Blood Loss After the Neonatal Arterial Switch Procedure
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1627 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
M. J. Scallan
Cerebral injury during paediatric heart surgery: perfusion issues
Perfusion, July 1, 2004; 19(4): 221 - 228.
[Abstract] [PDF]