PEDIATRICS Vol. 100 No. 6 December 1997, pp. 1045-1048
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To the Editor.
Parker et al1 describe the efficacy and safety of
intravenous midazolam and ketamine for sedating children undergoing
therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. The authors are to be
congratulated for attempting to make the sedation process safer for
children undergoing painful and nonpainful diagnostic and therapeutic
procedures. We have specific concerns, however, about the way this
document was written. In the abstract, the authors state that this
dissociative anesthetic was used to provide "conscious sedation."
"Conscious sedation" implies that the patient is conscious, ie, in
contact with their environment and responds appropriately to verbal
commands and physical stimulation. This does not mean reflex withdrawal to pain, but rather an appropriate response to a painful stimulus such
as saying "ouch" or pushing
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. H. Hertzog, J. K. Campbell, H. J. Dalton, and G. J. Hauser Propofol Anesthesia for Invasive Procedures in Ambulatory and Hospitalized Children: Experience in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Pediatrics, March 1, 1999; 103(3): 30e - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||