Published online June 25, 2007
PEDIATRICS (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2603)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

ARTICLE

Mass Distribution of Free, Intranasally Administered Influenza Vaccine in a Public School System

L. Rand Carpenter, DVMa,b, John Lott, MSc, Brian M. Lawson, MAc, Stephanie Hall, MD, MPHc, Allen S. Craig, MDb, William Schaffner, MDd and Timothy F. Jones, MDb

a Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
b Communicable and Environmental Disease Services, Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee
c Knox County Health Department, Knoxville, Tennessee
d Department of Preventive Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee

OBJECTIVE. School-based influenza vaccination programs are a potentially important method of protecting the community against influenza. We evaluated the feasibility and success of a large, school-based influenza vaccination campaign.

METHODS. On-site administration of intranasally administered, live attenuated influenza vaccine was offered to all students and staff members in a large, metropolitan public school system in October to December 2005. We evaluated vaccine coverage levels, resources expended, and physician and parent attitudes and knowledge.

RESULTS. Of 53420 public school students, 24198 were vaccinated with live attenuated influenza vaccine. Of 5841 school staff members, 3626 were vaccinated with live attenuated influenza vaccine or inactivated influenza vaccine. The proportions of students vaccinated were 56% among elementary schools, 45% among middle schools, and 30% among high schools. Schools with larger proportions of black or low-income families had lower vaccine coverage levels. The health department and school system expended 6900 person-hours during the campaign, and various health department clinics were closed for a total of 84 half-days. Community physicians were supportive of the campaign and frequently advised participation for eligible patients. Some physicians had misunderstandings about live attenuated influenza vaccine contraindications. Concern about adverse effects, having asthma, negative physician advice, and nonparticipation in any vaccination program were common reasons for students not participating.

CONCLUSIONS. This influenza vaccination campaign in a large public school system achieved relatively high vaccine coverage levels but required a substantial resource commitment from the local health department. This evaluation has critical implications for the ongoing debate regarding immunization policies for school-aged children and preparedness plans for pandemic influenza.

Key Words: influenza • immunizations • live attenuated influenza vaccine vaccine • herd immunity

Abbreviations: LAIV—live attenuated influenza vaccine • TIV—trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine

Accepted Jan 25, 2007.