PEDIATRICS Vol. 99 No. 3 March 1997, pp. e8 (doi:10.1542/peds.99.3.e8)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Broyles, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Swint, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Broyles, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Swint, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 99 No. 3 March 1997, p. e8
Copyright ©1997 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Have Medicaid Reimbursements Been a Credible Measure of the Cost of Pediatric Care?

Received Nov 2, 1995; accepted Jun 6, 1996.

R. Sue Broyles*, Jon E. Tyson*, and J. Michael SwintDagger

From the * University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Department of Pediatrics, Dallas, Texas; and the Dagger  University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, Texas.

Objective.  Despite uncertain validity as a measure of cost, Medicaid reimbursements may be used to compare the costs of different pediatric interventions. We explored the credibility of Medicaid reimbursements as a measure of the costs of inpatient care associated with two different approaches to follow-up care for high-risk indigent infants.

Design.  Analysis of Medicaid reimbursements within a randomized trial of primary follow-up care.

Patients.  Infants <= 1500 g at birth in a large county hospital (Parkland Memorial Hospital).

Intervention.  Conventional care after nursery discharge (with well-baby care and care for chronic illnesses provided in our follow-up clinic) or primary care (with care for acute illnesses also provided in the follow-up clinic). Measures to prevent a lapse in Medicaid coverage were included in all clinic visits.

Outcome Measures.  The completeness, comparability, and plausibility of Medicaid reimbursements for inpatient care of the two groups between nursery discharge and 1 year adjusted age.

Results.  A high percentage (90% to 91%) of both groups were enrolled in Medicaid. However, with fewer clinic visits in the conventional care group, Medicaid coverage often lapsed in this group, particularly among the highest risk infants. As a result, the proportion of hospital days reimbursed by Medicaid was substantially lower for conventional care than primary care infants (53% [92/174] vs 96% [298/310]). An even larger disparity was observed for pediatric intensive care days (10% [6/61] vs 100% [33/33]). Implausible Medicaid reimbursements included a lower reimbursement rate per day in the pediatric intensive care unit than on the pediatric floor (1 infant), a lower reimbursement rate per day for hospital care than home care (1 infant), and a mean reimbursement rate per day for our private pediatric teaching hospital ($1244/day) that did not exceed that for the private nonteaching pediatric hospital ($1268/day). The reimbursement rate for our public teaching hospital was particularly low ($507/day) despite a high acuity of illness (21% of hospital days in the pediatric intensive care unit).

Conclusions.  Without proper validation, reimbursements from Medicaid (or any program that replaces it) should not be assumed to provide an unbiased or acceptably accurate measure of the relative or absolute cost of pediatric health care interventions. primary care, follow-up care, cost, Medicaid, economic analysis, health care delivery.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?