PEDIATRICS Vol. 98 No. 4 October 1996, pp. 673-675
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Anand, K. J.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Anand, K. J.S.

Laceration Repair Using a Tissue Adhesive in a Children's Emergency Department

Thomas B. Bruns MD1, Harold K. Simon MD2, David J. McLario DO, MS2, Kevin M. Sullivan PhD, MPH, MHA2, Robert J. Wood MD3, and K. J.S. Anand MBBS, DPhil2

1 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Egleston Children's Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta; Department of Pediatrics; Department of Ambulatory/Emergency Services, T.C. Thompson Children's Hospital, University of Tennessee College of Medicine-Chattanooga Unit, Chattanooga, Tennessee
2 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Egleston Children's Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta
3 Center for Cleft and Craniofacial Anomalies, Plastic, Reconstructive and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Emory Clinic, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta

Objective. To determine the effectiveness of a tissue adhesive, Histoacryl Blue (HAB), for laceration repair in children.

Design. Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Setting. A tertiary care pediatric emergency center at Egleston Children's Hospital.

Participants. Children who presented for laceration repair between October 1994 and February 1995 were prospectively evaluated. Patients less than 1 or greater than 18 years of age, those with lacerations greater than 5 cm, and those with lacerations located on the eyelids, ears, nose, lips, hands, feet, joints, or perineum were excluded.

Interventions. Following consent and routine wound management, including subcutaneous closure when deemed necessary, patients were randomized to receive skin sutures or HAB for cutaneous closure.

Methods. Length of time required for laceration repair was recorded. Parental perception of the pain experienced by their child was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Photographic documentation of scar appearance at the 2-month follow-up visit was evaluated by plastic surgeons using a visual analogue scale.

Results. Sixty-one children were enrolled: HAB group (N = 30), suture group (N = 31). No differences occurred between groups in laceration length, depth, location, or patient demographics. Length of time required for repair was decreased (median, HAB 7 minutes vs suture 17.0 minutes) and parental assessment of their child's pain was significantly less in the HAB group. Parents were more likely to recommend HAB over suturing to other parents or guardians. Cosmetic outcome in the HAB group was assessed to be as good as, or better than, the cosmetic outcome in the suture group as evaluated by two plastic surgeons.

Conclusion. The use of HAB for laceration repair is an acceptable alternative to conventional suturing with a comparable cosmetic outcome. Advantages include less pain to the child, no need for suture removal, and more efficient use of physician time. Parents were also more likely to recommend HAB over suturing for laceration repair.

Submitted on July 20, 1995
Accepted on December 6, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
J. Smith and I. Maconochie
Should we glue lip lacerations in children?
Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 83 - 84.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
A Mattick
Use of tissue adhesives in the management of paediatric lacerations
Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2002; 19(5): 382 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
A Mattick, G Clegg, T Beattie, and T Ahmad
A randomised, controlled trial comparing a tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) with adhesive strips (Steristrips) for paediatric laceration repair
Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2002; 19(5): 405 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch DermatolHome page
L. Bernard, J. Doyle, S. F. Friedlander, L. F. Eichenfield, N. F. Gibbs, and B. B. Cunningham
A Prospective Comparison of Octyl Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive (Dermabond) and Suture for the Closure of Excisional Wounds in Children and Adolescents
Arch Dermatol, September 1, 2001; 137(9): 1177 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. B. Bergman
The Journal in 1947 and 1997: A Dramatic Change
Pediatrics, July 1, 1998; 102(1): 186 - 190.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Pediatr. Rev.Home page
J. F. Knapp
In Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Pediatr. Rev., December 1, 1997; 18(12): 424 - 428.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
H. K. Simon, D. J. McLario, T. B. Bruns, W. T. Zempsky, R. J. Wood, and K. M. Sullivan
Long-term Appearance of Lacerations Repaired Using a Tissue Adhesive
Pediatrics, February 1, 1997; 99(2): 193 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch GeneralHome page
TISSUE ADHESIVE TO REPAIR LACERATIONS
Journal Watch (General), October 25, 1996; 1996(1025): 7 - 7.
[Full Text]