1 Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigations Branch, Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Objective. To determine the current practices and results of tuberculin skin test (TST) screening of schoolchildren in the United States.
Methods. Tuberculosis program staff in all states and the District of Columbia were asked about current requirements, practices, and results of school-based TST screening.
Results. Thirty-four states and the District of Columbia (69%) reported no current statewide statutes or policies for tuberculin screening of schoolchildren, and 10 (19%) reported having statewide requirements. In 6 states (12%), requirements were instituted at the local level, and 24 localities in these states were known to require screening. Of the 34 areas requiring screening, 18 (53%) screened all new entrants, 7 (21%) screened children in specific grades, and 9 (26%) used other criteria for screening. TST results were collected for 26 (76%) of 34 areas, and 6 areas collected results of follow-up evaluation of tuberculin-positive children. Additionally, 8 localities in 7 states with no screening requirements conducted tuberculin surveys. Sixteen areas provided results. In 7 of the 8 areas that collected information about birthplace, less than 2% of US-born children were tuberculin positive; foreign-born children had rates 6 to 24 times higher than US-born children. TST screening identified few cases of tuberculosis, less than 0.02% of the children screened.
Conclusion. School-based tuberculin screening identified low rates of positive TST results in US-born children. Resources should be directed toward screening children at high risk for tuberculous infection, as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Advisory Committee for Elimination of Tuberculosis.
Submitted on August 28, 1995
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. J. Flaherman, T. C. Porco, E. Marseille, and S. E. Royce Cost-effectiveness of Alternative Strategies for Tuberculosis Screening Before Kindergarten Entry Pediatrics, July 1, 2007; 120(1): 90 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Nelson, J. A. Jereb, and K. G. Castro New Guidelines About Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Children and Adolescents: A Welcome Advancement Pediatrics, October 1, 2004; 114(4): 1084 - 1086. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Pediatric Tuberculosis Collaborative Group Targeted Tuberculin Skin Testing and Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Children and Adolescents Pediatrics, October 1, 2004; 114(4/S2): 1175 - 1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chang, L. S. M. Wheeler, and K. P. Farrell Public Health Impact of Targeted Tuberculosis Screening in Public Schools Am J Public Health, December 1, 2002; 92(12): 1942 - 1945. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Froehlich, L. M. Ackerson, P. A. Morozumi, and the Pediatric Tuberculosis Study Group of Kaiser P Targeted Testing of Children for Tuberculosis: Validation of a Risk Assessment Questionnaire Pediatrics, April 1, 2001; 107(4): e54 - e54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Hennessey, J. M. Schulte, L. Cook, M. Collins, I. M. Onorato, and S. E. Valway Tuberculin Skin Test Screening Practices Among US Colleges and Universities JAMA, December 16, 1998; 280(23): 2008 - 2012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. LOBATO and P. C. HOPEWELL Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection after Travel to or Contact with Visitors from Countries with a High Prevalence of Tuberculosis Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 1998; 158(6): 1871 - 1875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Pong, B. J. Anders, K. S. Moser, M. Starkey, A. Gassmann, and R. E. Besser Tuberculosis Screening at 2 San Diego High Schools With High-Risk Populations Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 1998; 152(7): 646 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||