1 Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2194; MEDSTAT Group
2 MEDSTAT Group, Santa Barbara, California 93111
3 Value Health Sciences, Inc, Santa Monica California 90404; MEDSTAT Group
Objective. This article reviews and synthesizes evidence in the published literature on the safety and efficacy of oral rehydration therapy (ORT) among young children with pediatric gastroenteritis in developed nations.
Methodology. We searched the literature for randomized, controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of ORT with intravenous (IV) rehydration treatment and/or oral rehydration solutions (ORSs) of different sodium content. We combined the failure rates of each set of studies in statistical meta-analyses and conducted tests of homogeneity of treatment effect over all the studies and for subgroups of children defined by the trial type, the sodium content of the ORS, and the setting of care. We also conducted a multivariate logistic regression on the probability of failure to determine the relative importance of these factors, controlling for other characteristics of the trials. Other outcomes were also tabulated and discussed. These include the relative incidence of hypernatremia and hyponatremia induced by treatment; weight gain; the volume, frequency, and duration of diarrhea; for inpatient trials, the length of stay; and for outpatient trials, rates of hospitalization.
Results. The evidence suggests that among pediatric patients with gastroenteritis in developed countries, failure of ORT, defined as the need to rehydrate children intravenously, is infrequent. We found a combined overall ORT failure rate of 3.6%. We found no statistically significant difference in failure rates by trial type or the sodium content of the ORS. However, we did find some supporting evidence for a lower failure rate among children treated in outpatient settings. In addition, compared with patients rehydrated intravenously, pediatric patients treated with ORT were not found to be at higher risk of iatrogenic hypernatremia or hyponatremia. The evidence from the literature fails to show a consistent trend in favor of either high-or low-sodium solutions for rehydration of pediatric patients.
Conclusions. There seems to be a great potential for improving the medical treatment of children with acute gastroenteritis by the greater use of ORT.
Submitted on August 17, 1995
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R Boyd, M Busuttil, and P Stuart Pilot study of a paediatric emergency department oral rehydration protocol Emerg. Med. J., February 1, 2005; 22(2): 116 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Spandorfer, E. A. Alessandrini, M. D. Joffe, R. Localio, and K. N. Shaw Oral Versus Intravenous Rehydration of Moderately Dehydrated Children: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Pediatrics, February 1, 2005; 115(2): 295 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Taylor Oral Rehydration: In Pediatrics, Less Is Often Better Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 2004; 158(5): 420 - 421. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Fonseca, A. Holdgate, and J. C. Craig Enteral vs Intravenous Rehydration Therapy for Children With Gastroenteritis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 2004; 158(5): 483 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Klassen and L. Hartling In children with moderate dehydration, oral rehydration reduced ED stay and staff time compared with intravenous rehydration Evid. Based Med., July 1, 2003; 8(4): 116 - 116. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Armon, T Stephenson, R MacFaul, P Eccleston, U Werneke, and H. BAUMER An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2001; 85(2): 132 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Harkless A no charge prescription for oral rehydration solution during an initial office visit for acute diarrhoea in children decreased unscheduled follow up visits Evid. Based Nurs., July 1, 2000; 3(3): 75 - 75. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ladinsky, A. Duggan, M. Santosham, and M. Wilson The World Health Organization Oral Rehydration Solution in US Pediatric Practice: A Randomized Trial to Evaluate Parent Satisfaction Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2000; 154(7): 700 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. McConnochie, G. P. Conners, E. Lu, and C. Wilson How Commonly Are Children Hospitalized for Dehydration Eligible for Care in Alternative Settings? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 1999; 153(12): 1233 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Duggan, J. Lasche, M. McCarty, K. Mitchell, R. Dershewitz, S. J. Lerman, M. Higham, A. Radzevich, and R. E. Kleinman Oral Rehydration Solution for Acute Diarrhea Prevents Subsequent Unscheduled Follow-up Visits Pediatrics, September 1, 1999; 104 (3): e29 - e29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Gastanaduy and R. E. Begue Acute Gastroentertis Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 38(1): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Meyers, A. Sampson, R. Saladino, S. Dixit, W. Adams, and A. Mondolfi Safety and Effectiveness of Homemade and Reconstituted Packet Cereal-based Oral Rehydration Solutions: A Randomized Clinical Trial Pediatrics, November 1, 1997; 100(5): e3 - e3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||