PEDIATRICS Vol. 97 No. 6 June 1996, pp. 804-810
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, M.

Parent Comprehension of Polio Vaccine Information Pamphlets

Terry C. Davis PhD1, Joseph A. Bocchini Jr MD2, Doren Fredrickson MD, PhD3, Connie Arnold MS1, E. J. Mayeaux MD4, Peggy W. Murphy PhD1, Robert H. Jackson MD5, Nora Hanna 6, and Martha Paterson 1

1 Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Kansas University School of Medicine, Wichita
2 Department of Pediatrics, Kansas University School of Medicine, Wichita
3 Department of Preventive Medicine, Kansas University School of Medicine, Wichita
4 Department of Family Medicine, Kansas University School of Medicine, Wichita
5 Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shreveport
6 Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Kansas University School of Medicine, Wichitat

Background. Medical information pamphlets often are written using language that requires a reading level higher than parents of many pediatric patients have achieved. Anecdotal reports suggest that many parents may not readily understand the federally mandated Public Health Service vaccine information pamphlets prepared by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 1991. The level at which the pamphlets need to be written for low-reading-level parents is undetermined, as is whether parents reading at higher levels will accept low-reading-level materials.

Methods. To determine whether a simple pamphlet prepared at a low reading level using qualitative and adult education techniques would be preferable to the available CDC polio vaccine information pamphlet, we conducted an integrated qualitative-quantitative study. We compared the parent reading time and comprehension of a simplified pamphlet (Louisiana State University, LSU) comprising 4 pages, 322 words, 7 instructional graphics, and a text requiring a 6th grade reading ability with the equivalent 1991 CDC vaccine information pamphlet comprising 16 pages, 18,117 words, no graphics, and a text requiring a 10th grade reading level. We measured the reading ability of 522 parents of pediatric patients from northwest Louisiana seen at public clinics (81%) and in a private office (19%). Of the entire group, 39% were white, 60% African-American, and 1% Hispanic; the mean age was 29 years; the mean highest grade completed was 12th grade 3 months; and the reading level was less than 9th grade in 47% of parents and less than 7th grade in 20%. After parents were given one of the pamphlets to read, their reading time, comprehension, and attitude toward the pamphlet were measured.

Results. Mean comprehension was 15% lower for CDC than for LSU (56% vs 72% correct; P < .001) and reading time was three times longer for CDC than for LSU (13 minutes 47 seconds vs 4 minutes 20 seconds; P < .0001). These trends were significant for parents reading at all but the lowest levels. Mean comprehension and reading time did not differ among parents reading at the third grade level or less. However, mean comprehension was greater and reading time lower for LSU among parents at all reading abilities greater than the third grade. Parents in the private practice setting took the longest time to read the CDC (20 minutes 59 seconds vs 5 minutes 46 seconds, LSU), yet their comprehension on the LSU was significantly higher than on the CDC (94% vs 71%; P < .0001). Two focus groups of high-income parents were unanimous in preferring the LSU.

Conclusions. A short, simply written pamphlet with instructional graphics was preferred by high- and low-income parents seen in private and public clinics. The sixth grade reading level appears to be too high for many parents in public clinics; new materials aimed at third to fourth grade levels may be required. The new 1994 CDC immunization materials, written at the eighth grade level, may still be inappropriately high. The American medical community should adopt available techniques for the development of more effective patient-parent education materials.

Submitted on June 20, 1994
Accepted on June 12, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
C. L. Arnold, T. C. Davis, J. O. Frempong, S. G. Humiston, A. Bocchini, E. M. Kennen, and M. Lloyd-Puryear
Assessment of Newborn Screening Parent Education Materials
Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5/S1): S320 - S325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
T. C. Davis, S. G. Humiston, C. L. Arnold, J. A. Bocchini Jr, P. F. Bass III, E. M. Kennen, A. Bocchini, D. Williams, P. Kyler, and M. Lloyd-Puryear
Recommendations for Effective Newborn Screening Communication: Results of Focus Groups With Parents, Providers, and Experts
Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5/S1): S326 - S340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Promot PractHome page
B. A. Levandowski, P. Sharma, S. D. Lane, N. Webster, A. M. Nestor, D. A. Cibula, and S. Huntington
Parental Literacy and Infant Health: An Evidence-Based Healthy Start Intervention
Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2006; 7(1): 95 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
G. M. Reisfield, G. D. Paulian, and G. R. Wilson
"Johnny can't read": Another cause " of failed analgesia
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, November 1, 2005; 22(6): 433 - 436.
[PDF]

Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
M. S. Wolf, J. A. Gazmararian, and D. W. Baker
Health Literacy and Functional Health Status Among Older Adults
Arch Intern Med, September 26, 2005; 165(17): 1946 - 1952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The Diabetes EducatorHome page
R. L. Rothman, R. Malone, B. Bryant, C. Wolfe, P. Padgett, D. A. DeWalt, M. Weinberger, and M. Pignone
The Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes Scale: A Diabetes Knowledge Scale for Vulnerable Patients
The Diabetes Educator, March 1, 2005; 31(2): 215 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
R. L. Rothman, D. A. DeWalt, R. Malone, B. Bryant, A. Shintani, B. Crigler, M. Weinberger, and M. Pignone
Influence of Patient Literacy on the Effectiveness of a Primary Care-Based Diabetes Disease Management Program
JAMA, October 13, 2004; 292(14): 1711 - 1716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ BehavHome page
M. C. Rosal, K. V. Goins, E. T. Carbone, and D. E. Cortes
Views and Preferences of Low-Literate Hispanics Regarding Diabetes Education: Results of Formative Research
Health Educ Behav, June 1, 2004; 31(3): 388 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The Diabetes EducatorHome page
R. Rothman, R. Malone, B. Bryant, C. Horlen, D. DeWalt, and M. Pignone
The Relationship Between Literacy and Glycemic Control in a Diabetes Disease-Management Program
The Diabetes Educator, March 1, 2004; 30(2): 263 - 273.
[PDF]

Home page
 CA Cancer J ClinHome page
T. C. Davis, M. V. Williams, E. Marin, R. M. Parker, and J. Glass
Health Literacy and Cancer Communication
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2002; 52(3): 134 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
S. Busey, T. R. Schum, and J. R. Meurer
Parental Perceptions of Well-Child Care Visits in an Inner-city Clinic
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2002; 156(1): 62 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
A. Epee-Bounya, B. A. Gitterman, and R. Y. Moon
Parental Opinions Regarding Poliomyelitis Immunizations
Clinical Pediatrics, August 1, 2001; 40(8): 435 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
C. W. LeBaron, L. Rodewald, and S. Humiston
How Much Time Is Spent on Well-Child Care and Vaccinations?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 1999; 153(11): 1154 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Counci
Health Literacy: Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs
JAMA, February 10, 1999; 281(6): 552 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
J. Root and S. Stableford
Easy-to-Read Consumer Communications: A Missing Link in Medicaid Managed Care
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(1): 1 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ BehavHome page
T. C. Davis, R. Michielutte, E. N. Askov, M. V. Williams, and B. D. Weiss
Practical Assessment of Adult Literacy in Health Care
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 1998; 25(5): 613 - 624.
[Abstract]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
R. A. Dunn, P. E. Shenouda, D. R. Martin, and A. J. Schultz
Videotape Increases Parent Knowledge About Poliovirus Vaccines and Choices of Polio Vaccination Schedules
Pediatrics, August 1, 1998; 102(2): e26 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
F. P. Glascoe, F. Oberklaid, P. H. Dworkin, and F. Trimm
Brief Approaches to Educating Patients and Parents in Primary Care
Pediatrics, June 1, 1998; 101 (6): e10 - e10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]