PEDIATRICS Vol. 97 No. 5 May 1996, pp. 779
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, E. H.

Homeopathic Medicine

Edward H. Chapman MD, DHt1

1 American Institute of Homeopathy, Denver, CO 80220

I appreciate the willingness of the editor of Pediatrics to print this response to Sampson and London's five-page critique1 of the Nicaragua diarrhea study by Jacobs et al. Unfortunately, Jacobs et al 2 were not offered space to respond in the same issue, and the authors were not identified as members of an organization with a mission to debunk complimentary medicine. The publication of their article in a prestigious journal appears a deliberate attempt to discredit the evidence available to defend homeopathy in a lawsuit in which one author is a plaintiff.