PEDIATRICS Vol. 97 No. 4 April 1996, pp. 486-491
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bunin, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mitelman, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bunin, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mitelman, O.

Informing Subjects of Epidemiologic Study Results

Greta R. Bunin PhD1, Anne E. Kazak PhD1, and Olga Mitelman BA1

1 Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia

Objective. To assess the feasibility and process of providing feedback to parents regarding the results of epidemiologic research, in particular to look at the importance and clarity of the information provided, parental reactions to the results, and utilization of the data provided.

Methodology. Parents who participated in an epidemiologic study of pediatric brain tumors (patient and control mothers) were sent a letter summarizing the results of the study and the Parent Study Results Survey to complete and return. The final sample used for analyses was 109 (patient) and 90 (control) mothers. Analyses were conducted to determine differences between patient and control mothers and differences among subsets defined by educational level and vital status of the patient.

Results. Mothers rated the importance and clarity of the information very highly, although patient mothers were more likely than control mothers to want more information and a telephone contact. Patient and control mothers were similar in reported sadness, anxiety, and being overwhelmed, but patient mothers felt less satisfied and relieved. Patient mothers expressed feeling more guilt and anger than control mothers, although even the levels among the patient mothers were only moderate. Close to half of all mothers commented on the inconclusiveness of the study results. Nearly all mothers indicated they would suggest that other parents participate in epidemiologic research.

Conclusions. It is valuable to many parents that they receive information about results of research in which they have participated. We found little evidence of strong negative effects to a detailed feedback letter. We recommend that evaluative data be used to guide the process of informing research participants about study results and that investigators consider making feedback letters a standard part of research protocols.

Submitted on March 13, 1995
Accepted on May 30, 1996




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page
S D MacNeil and C V Fernandez
Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies
J. Med. Ethics, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 49 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
H. Rigby and C. V. Fernandez
Providing research results to study participants: support versus practice of researchers presenting at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting
Blood, August 15, 2005; 106(4): 1199 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
C. Snowdon, J. Garcia, and D. Elbourne
Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: exploratory study
BMJ, July 4, 1998; 317(7150): 21 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text]