PEDIATRICS Vol. 97 No. 3 March 1996, pp. 301-307
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hackenberg, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hackenberg, D.

Comparison of Topical Anesthetics Without Cocaine to Tetracaine-Adrenaline-Cocaine and Lidocaine Infiltration During Repair of Lacerations: Bupivacaine-Norepinephrine Is an Effective New Topical Anesthetic Agent

Gary A. Smith MD, DrPH1, Steven D. Strausbaugh RPh2, Cynthia Harbeck-Weber PhD1, Brenda J. Shields MS1, Jean D. Powers PhD3, and Douglas Hackenberg MD1

1 The Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
2 The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
3 Children's Hospital Research Foundation and The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Objective. To compare the effectiveness of four topical anesthetics that do not contain cocaine with that of topical tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine (TAC) and lidocaine infiltration during laceration repair in children.

Design. This was a randomized, blinded trial.

Setting. The study was conducted in the emergency department of a large children's hospital.

Participants. Subjects were children 2 years of age or older with a laceration 5 cm or less in length that required suturing.

Interventions. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four noncocaine-containing topical anesthetics, topical TAC, or lidocaine infiltration anesthesia before laceration repair.

Outcome Measures. Outcome measures assessed pain perceptions using a Visual Analogue Scale, Likert scale, and Anesthetic Effectiveness scale. Distress behaviors of patients were measured with the Restrained Infants and Children Distress Rating Scale.

Results. Two hundred forty patients were enrolled in the study. Using agr = 0.05 and beta = 0.2, there was statistical power to detect differences of 0.3 to 1.3 U for the outcome measures used. The bupivacaine-norepinephrine topical solution (Bupivanor) performed better than the other three new topical preparations. It provided effective wound anesthesia during laceration repair, especially for lacerations of the face and scalp, where it was consistently rated as effective as TAC and 1% lidocaine infiltration by all observer groups for all outcome measures. There was a 4% overall wound complication rate, including one wound infection.

Conclusion. Bupivanor is an effective alternative to TAC and lidocaine infiltration for local anesthesia during laceration repair, especially on the face and scalp. The effectiveness of Bupivanor on the face is important, because it is here where TAC is most likely inadvertently to come into contact with mucous membranes and result in systemic toxicity. Because pain and distress scores did not take into consideration the pain associated with the initial injection of lidocaine, the findings of this study conservatively estimate Bupivanor's effectiveness compared with lidocaine infiltration.

Key Words: bupivacaine • lidocaine • TAC • topical anesthesia • anesthetic • local • laceration • suture techniques • pain • emergency department

Submitted on March 7, 1994
Accepted on September 11, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
B. J. Shields, D. M. Cohen, C. Harbeck-Weber, J. D. Powers, and G. A. Smith
Pediatric Pain Measurement Using a Visual Analogue Scale: A Comparison of Two Teaching Methods
Clinical Pediatrics, April 1, 2003; 42(3): 227 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
S Bush
Is cocaine needed in topical anaesthesia?
Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2002; 19(5): 418 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
G. A. Smith, D. M. Cohen, S. D. Strausbaugh, B. J. Shields, C. Harbeck-Weber, and J. D. Powers
Tetracaine-Lidocaine-Phenylephrine Topical Anesthesia Compared with Lidocaine Infiltration During Repair of Mucous Membrane Lacerations in Children
Clinical Pediatrics, July 1, 1998; 37(7): 405 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
G. A. Smith, S. D. Strausbaugh, C. Harbeck-Weber, D. M. Cohen, B. J. Shields, and J. D. Powers
New Non-Cocaine-Containing Topical Anesthetics Compared With Tetracaine-Adrenaline-Cocaine During Repair of Lacerations
Pediatrics, November 1, 1997; 100(5): 825 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]