PEDIATRICS Vol. 97 No. 2 February 1996, pp. 203
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Student,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Student,

EVIDENCE-BASED EDITING—AT LAST!

Student

Editors and others are beginning to research the process of peer review. Most questions about the peer review process cannot yet be answered on the basis of evidence, but some can: for instance, we have evidence that blinding reviewers to the identity of authors leads them to produce better opinions and that structured abstracts contain more information than unstructured ones.