PEDIATRICS Vol. 97 No. 2 February 1996, pp. 185-191
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiemann, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Berenson, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiemann, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Berenson, A. B.

An Investigation Into Why Adolescents May Reject Norplant

Constance M. Wiemann PhD1 and Abbey B. Berenson MD1

1 The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston.

Objectives. To identify characteristics of patients 18 years of age and younger who would and would not consider using levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) for contraception and to isolate potential barriers to its use.

Study Design. Survey of 323 adolescents attending family planning or obstetrics clinics between April 29 and October 27,1992. For purposes of analyses, patients were stratified by their willingness to consider using Norplant. Statements about Norplant that differentiated between groups were considered significant barriers. Additional analyses were conducted for the sample, stratified by pregnancy status, race and ethnicity, parity, and Norplant class attendance.

Results. Sixty-four percent of participants stated that they would be willing to consider using Norplant. These adolescents were significantly older, were more likely to already have given birth or have had abortions, planned to delay (additional) childbearing for 5 or more years, aspired to receive college educations, and reported lower annual household incomes than did adolescents unwilling to consider using the device. Identified barriers to Norplant use included misinformation, perceived advantages, physical aversions, perceived efficacy, fertility concerns, social influences, and concerns about safety and side effects.

Conclusions. Misperceptions and concerns about safety and side effects will prevent many adolescents from using Norplant. Recent negative publicity surrounding its use will intensify this problem. Health care providers must work to remove these barriers so that sexually active adolescents can make informed decisions about contraceptives.

Key Words: Norplant • contraception • adolescents • knowledge • attitudes

Submitted on November 28, 1994
Accepted on April 4, 1995