PEDIATRICS Vol. 97 No. 1 January 1996, pp. 32
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

NEONATOLOGY'S WOES

Multiple conflicting factors have, in recent years, contributed to a sense of disempowerment of the specialty of neonatology. Economic fingers point to a disproportionate use of medical resources by neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and a disproportionate share of morbidity in surviving patients. We have fallen out of favor with pediatric residency training programs that point to our man-eating use of resident hours and continue to decrease the number of months such individuals should spend in the newborn intensive care unit (ICU) during their training. Health maintenance organization (HMO) groups barter for lower and lower capitation rates. For the first time, many units are faced with laying off neonatologists. Finally, a pluralistic society, which has become more verbal, tells us that our choices are not theirs.