Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis on the Birth Prevalence of Neural Tube Defects, Atlanta, 1990-4991
1 Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atalata, GA
2 Birth Defects and Genetic Diseases Branch, Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA
3 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Objective. To determine the impact of prenatal diagnosis on the birth prevalence of neural tube defects (NTDs) in Atlanta during 1990 through 1991.
Methods. Live-born and stillborn infants with NTDs who were at least 20 weeks' gestation were ascertained by the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP), a population-based birth defects registry. Prenatally diagnosed NTD-affected pregnancies were ascertained from the four perinatal centers and the three genetic laboratories operating in Atlanta during 1990 through 1991. Fetal death certificates were also reviewed for potential cases.
Results. During 1990 through 1991, MACDP ascertained 59 NTD cases, for a birth prevalence of 0.77/1000 live births. During this period, an additional 28 NTD-affected pregnancies were detected prenatally and terminated before 20 weeks' gestation. The adjusted NTD rate during 1990 through 1991, which includes prenatally diagnosed cases, was 1.13/1000 live births.
Conclusions. Prenatal diagnosis is making a substantial impact on the birth prevalence of NTDs in Atlanta. However, since NTD rates in Atlanta were 2 to 2.5 per 1000 live births in 1970, prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy does not completely account for the declining rate of NTDs.
Submitted on November 21, 1994Accepted on January 10, 1995
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Gucciardi, M.-A. Pietrusiak, D. L. Reynolds, and J. Rouleau Incidence of neural tube defects in Ontario, 1986-1999 Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 1, 2002; 167(3): 237 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Liu, K. S. Joseph, M. S. Kramer, A. C. Allen, R. Sauve, I. D. Rusen, S. W. Wen, and for the Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Relationship of Prenatal Diagnosis and Pregnancy Termination to Overall Infant Mortality in Canada JAMA, March 27, 2002; 287(12): 1561 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Honein, L. J. Paulozzi, T. J. Mathews, J. D. Erickson, and L.-Y. C. Wong Impact of Folic Acid Fortification of the US Food Supply on the Occurrence of Neural Tube Defects JAMA, June 20, 2001; 285(23): 2981 - 2986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M.J. van der Put, H. W.M. van Straaten, F. J.M. Trijbels, and H. J. Blom Folate, Homocysteine and Neural Tube Defects: An Overview Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 1, 2001; 226(4): 243 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Neural Tube Defect Surveillance and Folic Acid Intervention--Texas-Mexico Border, 1993-1998 JAMA, June 14, 2000; 283(22): 2928 - 2930. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







