PEDIATRICS Vol. 96 No. 1 July 1995, pp. 168
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Di Maio, V. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Di Maio, V. J. M.

Letters to the Editor

Vincent J. M. Di Maio MD1

1 Bexar County Forensic Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-4565

In the editorial by Little and Brooks,1 the authors refer to "new information" that two of the five deaths in the study by Steinschneider2 were in fact murders. This brings into question the conclusions of the Steinschneider study, the relationship between apnea and sudden infant death syndrome (if any) and, perhaps, the use of home monitors. All of this was not "new information" to the Forensic Pathology community. That the two deaths in the study by Steinschneider were probably homicide was stated in a chapter in Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, a letter to Pediatrics, and in the textbook Forensic Pathology.3