PEDIATRICS Vol. 95 No. 6 June 1995, pp. 954-956
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brent, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brent, R. L.

Bringing Scholarship to the Courtroom

Robert L. Brent MD, PhD, DSc1

1 Alfred I. duPont Institute, Wilmington, DE 19899

In this issue there is a commentary by Dr Gary McAbee on the US Supreme Court rules on expert testimony.1 Dr McAbee has chosen to discuss the matter of expert witness testimony. The basis for his discussion is the recent US Supreme Court decision on the proper standard for admissibility of scientific evidence in the courtroom.

The decision of the court involved the evaluation of testimony provided in a Bendectin lawsuit, Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals.1,2




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
R. S. MASELLA and M. MEISTER
The ethics of health care professionals' opinions for hire
J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2001; 132(3): 361 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]