PEDIATRICS Vol. 94 No. 2 August 1994, pp. 230-233
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Finer, N. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Finer, N. N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Changing Attitudes and Practices Regarding Local Analgesia for Newborn Circumcision

C. Anthony Ryan MB, MRCPI, FRCPC1 and Neil N. Finer MD, FRCPC1

1 Department of Newborn Medicine, Royal Alexandra Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5H 3V9

Study objective. To change physician attitudes and practices regarding the routine use of local and regional anesthesia for newborn circumcision.

Design. Interventional study, followed by an audit of physician practice over a 1-month period, 1 year following interventions.

Setting. The newborn nurseries of the Womens' Pavilion, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton.

Interventions. A broad range of awareness and educational programs were directed at physicians who perform newborn circumcisions, including posters, newsletters, presentations at grand rounds, video recordings, and practical "hands-on" demonstration of the techniques of local anesthesia to the prepuce and dorsal penile nerve block.

Results. Only one physician was using local analgesia for newborn circumcision prior to the introduction of the educational program. The audit, performed 12 months later, documented 46 circumcisions performed by 22 physicians, each performing between 1 and 6 circumcisions (median = 1). Sixteen of the 22 physicians (73%) used either local anesthesia to the prepuce (19 cases) or dorsal penile nerve block (13 cases) during circumcisions. Thus, local analgesia was used in 66% (32/48) of all circumcisions. Six physicians, performing 16 circumcisions, did not use any form of analgesia.

Conclusions. This simple educational program has been associated with a remarkable change in attitudes and practice regarding local analgesia for neonatal circumcision. Our ideal objective, which we hope to achieve through repeated education and practical demonstrations of the techniques to interested physicians, is that all newborn circumcisions are performed under local or regional anesthesia in our institution.

Submitted on November 10, 1993
Accepted on January 18, 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
D. A. Bloom and H. P. Koo
The Circumcision Issue
Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 1999; 38(4): 243 - 244.
[PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
H. J. Stang and L. W. Snellman
Circumcision Practice Patterns in the United States
Pediatrics, June 1, 1998; 101 (6): e5 - e5.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]