PEDIATRICS Vol. 94 No. 1 July 1994, pp. 93
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by L., J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by L., J. F.

ETHICAL PROBLEMS IN NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT—MEDICAL DECISION MAKING ON THE NEONATE WITH POOR PROGNOSIS

J. F. L. MD

In current NICU (neonatal intensive care units), it is inevitable that ethical decisions on neonates with a poor prognosis will have to be made. At Tokyo Women's Medical College, we have been applying our own policy of medical decision making, which is somewhat different to those of most western countries. Most families are not asked to make final decisions, and the ethical committee is not actively involved. Staff in the NICU make the decision after plenary discussions. The position after decision making is not to discontinue the life supporting system but to observe, with no additional treatments and with routine care (class C). From October 1984 to September 1989, 58 out of 1589 neonates admitted to the NICU at Tokyo Women's Medical College died and 32 (55%) of them were classified as class C. The main causes of medical decision making were: non-viable (4/4, 100%), lethal malformations (13/20, 65%) and birth asphyxia (15/19, 79%). Early Hum Dcv. 1992; 29: 403-406.