PEDIATRICS Vol. 94 No. 1 July 1994, pp. 90-93
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atkins, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kerber, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atkins, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kerber, R. E.

Pediatric Defibrillation: Current Flow Is Improved by Using "Adult" Electrode Paddles

Dianne L. Atkins MD1 and Richard E. Kerber MD2

1 Department of Pediatrics, The Cardiovascular Center, the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
2 Department of Internal Medicine, The Cardiovascular Center, the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242

Objective. Current flow, the major determinant of defibrillation success, depends on delivered energy and transthoracic impedance. Previous experimental data suggest that transthoracic impedance is higher using "pediatric" electrode paddles compared to the larger "adult" electrode paddles. There are few data from actual shocks to support the experimental studies. The purpose of this study was to measure transthoracic impedance during actual shock delivery and to determine the optimal electrode paddle size for pediatric defibrillation and cardioversion.

Methods. We prospectively evaluated all shocks of le 20 joules given to pediatric patients at the University of Iowa from 1988 to 1992. Data collected included energy selected by the operator, energy delivered by the defibrillator, peak current flow and transthoracic impedance. Data were analyzed by unpaired t test and linear regression.

Results. Fifty-five shocks were delivered to 20 patients, age newborn to 8 years. Thirty-seven shocks were given with "pediatric" electrode paddles (surface area 21 cm2) and 18 with "adult" electrode paddles (surface area 83 cm2). Selected energy correlated well with delivered energy (r = .98, P < .0001). Delivered energy using "pediatric" electrodes did not differ from that delivered with "adult" electrodes (8.0±0.9 joules vs 10.5 ± 1.2 joules P > .1). However transthoracic impedance was significantly higher with "pediatric" electrodes (78.1±4.4 ohms vs 54.6 ± 2.7 ohms P < .0008), resulting in lower peak current flow through "pediatric" electrode paddles (6.2±0.5 amps vs 8.7 ± 0.5 amps P < .002). There was no correlation between joules/kg and peak current flow (r = .26, P > .05).

Conclusion. Use of "pediatric" electrode paddies results in higher transthoracic impedance and thus lower peak current flow. In pediatric defibrillation, larger "adult" electrode paddies should be used as soon as chest size permits (approximateiy 10 kg). Lower transthoracic impedance results in higher current flow that facilitates cardioversion and defibrillation.

Submitted on June 7, 1993
Accepted on December 7, 1993




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
P Jones and N Lode
Ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation
Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 916 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
American Heart Association
2005 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) of Pediatric and Neonatal Patients: Pediatric Advanced Life Support
Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5): e1005 - e1028.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support
Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-167 - IV-187.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 3: Defibrillation
Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-17 - III-24.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. S. Takata, R. L. Page, and J. A. Joglar
Automated External Defibrillators: Technical Considerations and Clinical Promise
Ann Intern Med, December 4, 2001; 135(11): 990 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. L. Atkins, L. L. Hartley, and D. K. York
Accurate Recognition and Effective Treatment of Ventricular Fibrillation by Automated External Defibrillators in Adolescents
Pediatrics, March 1, 1998; 101(3): 393 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]