PEDIATRICS Vol. 93 No. 6 June 1994, pp. 986-988
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pomeranz, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fairley, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pomeranz, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fairley, J. A.

Management Errors Leading to Unnecessary Hospitalization for Kerion

Albert J. Pomeranz MD1 and Janet A. Fairley MD2

1 Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin
2 Department of Dermatology, Medical College of Wisconsin

Objective. Tinea capitis is a common problem in the inner city, outpatient population. It is known that some children were being admitted for treat- ment of the kerion type of tinea capitis. The purpose of this study was to determine why these children were being admitted and whether hospitalization was justified.

Design. A retrospective study of all children hospitalized at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin between January 1990 and December 1992 with the diagnosis of tinea capitis was performed.

Results. Twenty-nine children who were hospitalized with tinea capitis were identified. In 10 cases, tinea capitis was the primary reason for admission, in 19 patients it was a secondary diagnosis. All of the patients with a primary diagnosis of tinea capitis were presumed to have a secondary bacterial infection of the kerion; however, this was not verified by the workup of any patient. Numerous deviations from optimal treatment were noted in both groups of patients. Although tinea capitis had been correctly diagnosed before admission in seven primary tinea capitis patients, only two of these patients received oral griseofulvin. The patients in whom tinea capitis was a secondary diagnosis also had a number of therapeutic deficiencies including failure to prescribe griseofulvin (16%), failure to administer griseofulvin with a fatty food or meal (58%), and failure to prescribe a sporicidal shampoo (63%).

Conclusions. Although all patients were assumed to have a secondary bacterial infection, this could not be documented. With the possible exception of one patient all the symptoms described by the patients could be explained by the highly inflammatory nature of a kerion. A better understanding of the degree of inflammation that may accompany a kerion, as well as its proper treatment, may prevent unnecessary hospitalization of children.

Submitted on August 11, 1993
Accepted on November 10, 1993




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. N. Lobato, D. J. Vugia, and I. J. Frieden
Tinea Capitis in California Children: A Population-based Study of a Growing Epidemic
Pediatrics, April 1, 1997; 99(4): 551 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]