1 Joint Program in Neonatology (Children's Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Beth Israel Hospital in Boston), Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School
2 Joint Program in Neonatology (Children's Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Beth Israel Hospital in Boston), Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Depertment of Maternal and Child Health, Harvard School of Public Health
3 Division of Infectious Diseases and the Division of Quality Improvement, Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School
Background. Clinicians' estimates of mortality risk in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have implications for patient triage, transfer, initiation and termination of life support, and allocation of medical resources. The accuracy of these judgments has not been studied, nor the differences between nurses and attending physicians.
Objectives. 1) evaluate the accuracy of subjective judgments of NICU unit mortality risk, 2) identify the key components of clinician judgments, 3) compare accuracy between attending physicians and nurses, and 4) examine the utility of combining an objectively computed risk and clinician judgments to improve predictions.
Methods. We obtained estimates of mortality risk on 544 admissions to two NICUs on the day of admission from the attending physician and primary nurse. These were compared with an objective computed mortality risk based on birth weight and the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP) using a linear judgment analysis model, as well as with actual outcomes.
Results. Physicians and nurses had good discriminating power with actual mortality rates ranging from 0% among low risk patients to 67% among those with the highest mortality estimates. Physicians had a tendency to overestimate mortality risk. Clinicians base their estimates on the same factors and similar judgment weights as the empiric mortality risk model (22% birth weight, 62% illness severity (SNAP), 13% low Apgar, and 3% for intrauterine growth restriction). Clinicians place additional emphasis on therapeutic as well as physiologic factors. When the computed risk and physician judgment were combined, both made significant contributions in a logistic mortality risk model.
Conclusions. Clinician judgments of mortality risk are fairly accurate and similar to an objective illness severity index. This simple method provides insight into clinical decision making and has important applications in improving direct patient care, appropriate allocation of medical resources, and medical training.
Submitted on July 6, 1993
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Meadow, J. Lagatta, B. Andrews, L. Caldarelli, A. Keiser, J. Laporte, S. Plesha-Troyke, M. Subramanian, S. Wong, J. Hron, et al. Just, in Time: Ethical Implications of Serial Predictions of Death and Morbidity for Ventilated Premature Infants Pediatrics, April 1, 2008; 121(4): 732 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. Kamoji, J. S. Dorling, B. N. Manktelow, E. S. Draper, and D. J. Field Extremely Growth-Retarded Infants: Is There a Viability Centile? Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): 758 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J S Dorling, D J Field, and B Manktelow Neonatal disease severity scoring systems Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2005; 90(1): F11 - F16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J P Marcin, R K Pretzlaff, M M Pollack, K M Patel, and U E Ruttimann Certainty and mortality prediction in critically ill children J. Med. Ethics, June 1, 2004; 30(3): 304 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Meadow, L. Frain, Y. Ren, G. Lee, S. Soneji, and J. Lantos Serial Assessment of Mortality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit by Algorithm and Intuition: Certainty, Uncertainty, and Informed Consent Pediatrics, May 1, 2002; 109(5): 878 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Marcin, M. M. Pollack, K. M. Patel, B. M. Sprague, and U. E. Ruttimann Prognostication and Certainty in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Pediatrics, October 1, 1999; 104(4): 868 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Escobar, S. Joffe, M. N. Gardner, M. A. Armstrong, B. F. Folck, and D. M. Carpenter Rehospitalization in the First Two Weeks After Discharge From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Pediatrics, July 1, 1999; 104(1): 2e - 2. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B Zernikow, K Holtmannspoetter, E Michel, W Pielemeier, F Hornschuh, A Westermann, and K H Hennecke Artificial neural network for risk assessment in preterm neonates Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 1998; 79(2): 129F - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Cooper, C. L. Berseth, J. M. Adams, and L. E. Weisman Actuarial Survival in the Premature Infant Less Than 30 Weeks' Gestation Pediatrics, June 1, 1998; 101(6): 975 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Petridou, D. K. Richardson, N. Dessypris, A. Malamitsi-Puchner, S. Mantagos, D. Nicolopoulos, C. Papas, H. Salvanos, S. Sevastiadou, J. Sofatzis, et al. Outcome Prediction in Greek Neonatal Intensive Care Units Using a Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP) Pediatrics, June 1, 1998; 101(6): 1037 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P W Fowlie, W O Tarnow-Mordi, C R Gould, and D Strang Predicting outcome in very low birthweight infants using an objective measure of illness severity and cranial ultrasound scanning Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 1998; 78(3): 175F - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. McCormick The Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Are We Asking the Right Questions? Pediatrics, June 1, 1997; 99(6): 869 - 869. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||