Age-Related Response to Lidocaine-Prilocaine (EMLA) Emulsion and Effect of Music Distraction on the Pain of Intravenous Cannulation

¹ State University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands
² Departments of Immunology/Allergy and the Department of Anaesthetics, Prince of Wales Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
³ Department of Radiation Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia

Objective. To compare the efficacy of a local anesthetic cream and music distraction in reducing or preventing pain from needle puncture (intravenous cannulation) in children. A secondary aim was to examine the influence of age on the pain report and behavior and on the therapeutic outcome.

Methodology. Children aged 4 to 16 years (N = 180) who were to undergo surgery under general anesthesia via intravenous cannulation were randomly allocated to one of three interventions. The comparison of lidocaine-prilocaine emulsion (EMLA, Astra) and a placebo emulsion was double-blind. Stratification by age group (4 to 6, 7 to 11, 12 to 16) ensured an equal number of children (20) in each intervention/age group category. A global assessment of the behavioral reaction to the procedure was made by the principal investigator, taking into account vocal, verbal, facial, and motor responses. The child was asked to assess pain severity on the Faces Pain Scale (FPS) and a visual analogue toy (VAT). The scales were applied conservatively as ordinal scales: FPS 0 to 6; VAT 0 to 10.

Results. Children who received lidocaine-prilocaine emulsion reported less pain (mean FF5 score = 1.42) compared with placebo emulsion (mean FPS score = 2.58) and with music distraction (mean FPS = 2.62). There was a highly significant therapeutic effect (P < .001) on the self-report and behavioral scores. Younger children, regardless of intervention, reported significantly more pain than the older children (mean FPS scores: 2.85, 2.33, 1.43 for age groups 4 to 6, 7 to 11, and 12 to 16 respectively; P < .001). The superiority of the local anesthetic emulsion was maximal in the youngest age group (4 to 6) almost eliminating pain-related behavior, and multiple regression analysis confirmed significant age and treatment effects and revealed interaction between therapeutic effect and age. Although a trend favoring the active emulsion was evident in the older children (7 to 11, 12 to 16) the differences were not significant. The pain scores were influenced by the type (gauge) of cannula, but this did not affect the conclusion regarding therapeutic and age effects. There was no influence of sex, experience with venipuncture, or whether the child was anxious on arrival in the operating room.

Conclusions. The results show that lidocaine-prilocaine emulsion is highly effective in preventing pain from venipunctures in young children the group in most need of prevention.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Pershad, S. C. Steinberg, and T. M. Waters Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Anesthetic Agents During Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation in the Pediatric Emergency Department Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 2008; 162(10): 952 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Kettwich, W. L. Sibbitt Jr., J. R. Brandt, C. R. Johnson, C. S. Wong, and A. D. Bankhurst Needle Phobia and Stress-Reducing Medical Devices in Pediatric and Adult Chemotherapy Patients Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, January 1, 2007; 24(1): 20 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C V Bellieni, D M Cordelli, M Raffaelli, B Ricci, G Morgese, and G Buonocore Analgesic effect of watching TV during venipuncture Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 1015 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Blount, T. Piira, L. L. Cohen, and P. S. Cheng Pediatric Procedural Pain Behav Modif, January 1, 2006; 30(1): 24 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Taddio, H. K. Soin, S. Schuh, G. Koren, and D. Scolnik Liposomal lidocaine to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural pain among children: a randomized controlled trial Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 21, 2005; 172(13): 1691 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. I. Tsao and L. K. Zeltzer Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approaches for Pediatric Pain: A Review of the State-of-the-science Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., June 1, 2005; 2(2): 149 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Migdal, E. Chudzynska-Pomianowska, E. Vause, E. Henry, and J. Lazar Rapid, Needle-Free Delivery of Lidocaine for Reducing the Pain of Venipuncture Among Pediatric Subjects Pediatrics, April 1, 2005; 115(4): e393 - e398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-C. P. Arai and W. Ueda Warm Steaming Enhances the Topical Anesthetic Effect of Lidocaine Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 982 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. B. Schiff, K. D. Holtz, N. Peterson, and T. Rakusan Effect of an Intervention to Reduce Procedural Pain and Distress for Children With HIV Infection J. Pediatr. Psychol., October 1, 2001; 26(7): 417 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Allen, L. H. Golden, J. L. Izzo Jr., M. I. Ching, A. Forrest, C. R. Niles, P. R. Niswander, and J. C. Barlow Normalization of Hypertensive Responses During Ambulatory Surgical Stress by Perioperative Music Psychosom Med, May 1, 2001; 63(3): 487 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Arrowsmith and C Campbell A comparison of local anaesthetics for venepuncture Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2000; 82(4): 309 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. A. Fein, J. M. Callahan, C. R. Boardman, and M. H. Gorelick Predicting the Need for Topical Anesthetic in the Pediatric Emergency Department Pediatrics, August 1, 1999; 104(2): 19e - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. L. Koh, D. Fanurik, M. L. Schmitz, and M. VonLanthen Efficacy of Parental Application of Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics for Intravenous Insertion Pediatrics, June 1, 1999; 103(6): 79e - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text]