PEDIATRICS Vol. 93 No. 4 April 1994, pp. 631-635
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pylipow, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kinney, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pylipow, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kinney, J. S.

Selective Intrapartum Prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus Colonization: Management and Outcome of Newborns

Mary Pylipow MD1, Monica Gaddis PhD2, and Janet S. Kinney MD3

1 Section of Pediatrics, Department of Family Practice, Truman Medical Center-East, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
2 Department of Research, Ball Memorial Hospital Munice, IN
3 Sections of Neonatology and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO

Objective. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) in mothers with group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization presents difficult neonatal management decisions. IAP was instituted in response to an increased incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis (EOGSS), and a study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of these newborns.

Methods. A study was undertaken at Truman Medical Center-East, a county hospital with a level 1 nursery. During the 20-month study period, prenatal GBS cultures were obtained on all mothers in their third trimester of pregnancy. At time of delivery, GBS-positive women who had at least one risk factor were to receive IAP. Risk factors included fever and/or amnionitis, premature labor, and prolonged rupture of membranes defined as >6 hours. Screening laboratory tests were performed on all newborns whose mothers received IAP. Only the newborns with positive screening laboratory tests or symptoms of sepsis received further laboratory evaluation and antibiotic treatment.

Results. During the study, 2040 mothers gave birth to 2054 newborns. Three hundred thirty-two mothers (16.3%) were colonized with GBS and 122 (37.0%) had at least one risk factor. IAP was given to 70 GBS-positive mothers. Thirty-three (27%) GBS-positive mothers with risk factors did not receive IAP for logistical reasons. Eleven full-term newborns had EOGBSS. For case newborns, the mean duration of ruptured membranes was 13.7 hours (range 2.5 to 28 hours). Vertical transmission occurred as follows: Cutaneous colonization was found in 33 (12.5%) newborns born to 261 mothers who received no IAP, and symptomatic EOGBSS was diagnosed in 9 (3.4%). Mothers who received one dose (n = 43) had three (6.9%) newborns with GBS colonization and two (4.7%) asymptomatic newborns with EOGBSS. No newborns born to 28 mothers who received two doses IAP had GBS colonization or were ill. Cutaneous vertical transmission was reduced (P = .03). Newborns born to GBS-positive mothers with one or more risk factors who received IAP had significantly less EOGBSS (P < .05) than those who did not receive IAP.

Conclusions. Selective IAP was administered safely to 21% of GBS-positive women, or 3.5% of all deliveries. IAP prevented EOGBSS when it could be given to GBS-positive mothers with a risk factor. Accurate identification of mothers with GBS colonization and their risk factors is essential for effective use of IAP. Earlier institution of IAP after rupture of membranes may reduce the risk of EOGBSS and the need for extensive infant evaluation.

Submitted on July 16, 1993
Accepted on October 8, 1993




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. Velaphi, J. D. Siegel, G. D. Wendel Jr, N. Cushion, W. M. Eid, and P. J. Sanchez
Early-Onset Group B Streptococcal Infection After a Combined Maternal and Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Chemoprophylaxis Strategy
Pediatrics, March 1, 2003; 111(3): 541 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. Oddie and N. D Embleton
Risk factors for early onset neonatal group B streptococcal sepsis: case-control study
BMJ, August 10, 2002; 325(7359): 308 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
Prevention of group B streptococcal infection in newborns: Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 1, 2002; 166(7): 928 - 930.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
G. J. Escobar, D.-k. Li, M. A. Armstrong, M. N. Gardner, B. F. Folck, J. E. Verdi, B. Xiong, R. Bergen, and for the Neonatal Infection Study Group
Neonatal Sepsis Workups in Infants >= 2000 Grams at Birth: A Population-Based Study
Pediatrics, August 1, 2000; 106(2): 256 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
J. Turow and A. R. Spitzer
Group B Streptococcal Infection Early Onset Disease Controversies in Prevention Guidelines, and Management Strategies for the Neonate
Clinical Pediatrics, June 1, 2000; 39(6): 317 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. E. Hickman, M. A. Rench, P. Ferrieri, and C. J. Baker
Changing Epidemiology of Group B Streptococcal Colonization
Pediatrics, August 1, 1999; 104(2): 203 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
W. E. Benitz, J. B. Gould, and M. L. Druzin
Preventing Early-onset Group B Streptococcal Sepsis: Strategy Development Using Decision Analysis
Pediatrics, June 1, 1999; 103(6): 76e - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
W. E. Benitz, J. B. Gould, and M. L. Druzin
Antimicrobial Prevention of Early-onset Group B Streptococcal Sepsis: Estimates of Risk Reduction Based on a Critical Literature Review
Pediatrics, June 1, 1999; 103(6): 78e - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. D. Siegel
1997 AAP Guidelines for Prevention of Early-onset Group B Streptococcal Disease
Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): 197 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
W. E. Benitz;, S. P. Gotoff, and K. M. Boyer
The Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Debate
Pediatrics, March 1, 1998; 101(3): 494 - 494.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
H. E. Jeffery and M. Moses Lahra
Eight-Year Outcome of Universal Screening and Intrapartum Antibiotics for Maternal Group B Streptococcal Carriers
Pediatrics, January 1, 1998; 101 (1): e2 - e2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
S. R. Allen
Management of Asymptomatic Term Neonates Whose Mothers Received Intrapartum Antibiotics Part-1: Rationale for ltrapartum Antibiotic Therapy
Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 1997; 36(10): 563 - 568.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. P. Gotoff and K. M. Boyer
Prevention of Early-onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease
Pediatrics, June 1, 1997; 99(6): 866 - 866.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. E. Johnson, J. K. Whitwell, K. Pethe, K. Saxena, and D. M. Super
Term Newborns Who Are at Risk for Sepsis: Are Lumbar Punctures Necessary?
Pediatrics, April 1, 1997; 99(4): e10 - e10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Committee on Infectious Diseases and Committee on
Revised Guidelines for Prevention of Early-onset Group B Streptococcal (GBS) Infection
Pediatrics, March 1, 1997; 99(3): 489 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
T. A. Merritt, D. Palmer, D. A. Bergman, and P. H. Shiono
Clinical Practice Guidelines in Pediatric and Newborn Medicine: Implications for Their Use in Practice
Pediatrics, January 1, 1997; 99(1): 100 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]