PEDIATRICS Vol. 93 No. 2 February 1994, pp. 183-187
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rooney, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rooney, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, E. B.

Development of a Screening Tool for Prediction of Children at Risk for Lead Exposure in a Midwestern Clinical Setting

Brenda L. Rooney PhD, MPH1, Brian K. Allen DO1, Pamela J. Strutt BSN, RN1, and Edward B. Hayes MD2

1 Gundersen Clinic, Ltd, La Crosse, WI
2 Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

Objective. Universal screening for childhood lead poisoning is becoming quite common, with many states having legislation requiring screening. We set out to determine whether a questionnaire could be used to identify children at risk for exposure to lead to determine whether selective screening of those at risk was possible.

Methods. Parents of 370 children 12 to 36 months of age having well-child examinations completed a questionnaire and their children were screened by a fingerstick capillary blood lead test at two clinics.

Results. Of patients from clinic A, 5.4% had lead levels ge10 µg/dL compared with 16.8% of those from clinic B (P < .001). This difference between clinics could not be explained by the demographic characteristics of the patients or by differences in their potential exposures to lead. We evaluated the five questions suggested by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for anticipatory guidance for their ability to identify children with elevated blood lead levels. In clinic A, this instrument had a sensitivity of 76.9% and a negative predictive value of 96.5%. In clinic B, it had a sensitivity of 63.6% and a negalive predictive value of 81.4% . Based on an assessment of significant items from a large questionnaire, we determined five questions that were the best predictors of risk. On the basis of this risk assessment, 100% of the children from clinic A with elevated lead levels and 90.9% of the children from clinic B with elevated lead levels were classified as being at "high risk." Had this risk assessment been used as an initial screen in this sample, 40% of the patients from clinic A and 37% of the patients from clinic B would not have been screened with a blood lead test, because they were classified as being at "low risk."

Conclusions. Results of this study suggest that there is great variability in the prevalence of elevated lead levels and potential risks between clinics within a fairly homogeneous community; however, selective screening with a community-specific questionnaire may be feasible if the prevalence is low and the risks to the population are known.

Submitted on April 23, 1993
Accepted on July 22, 1993




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
H. J. Binns, C. Campbell, M. J. Brown, and for the Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poiso
Interpreting and Managing Blood Lead Levels of Less Than 10 {micro}g/dL in Children and Reducing Childhood Exposure to Lead: Recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention
Pediatrics, November 1, 2007; 120(5): e1285 - e1298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
H. J. Binns, S. A. LeBailly, A. R. Fingar, and S. Saunders
Evaluation of Risk Assessment Questions Used to Target Blood Lead Screening in Illinois
Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): 100 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. R. Kemper, W. C. Bordley, and S. M. Downs
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lead Poisoning Screening Strategies Following the 1997 Guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 1998; 152(12): 1202 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
Committee on Environmental Health
Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels
Pediatrics, June 1, 1998; 101(6): 1072 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
B. P. Lanphear, R. S. Byrd, P. Auinger, and S. J. Schaffer
Community Characteristics Associated With Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children
Pediatrics, February 1, 1998; 101(2): 264 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]