1 Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
Background. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended using a five-item questionnaire at every regular office visit for all children 6 to 72 months of age to identify those at risk of high-dose exposure to lead.
Objective. To determine how well the questionnaire identifies children with elevated lead levels.
Research design. Comparison of results of the questionnaire, which is intended to identify children as being low-risk or high-risk for lead poisoning, with children's blood lead levels.
Setting. A pediatric continuity clinic located in a major teaching hospital in Rochester, NY.
Patients. A consecutive sample of 476 children aged 6 to 72 months without a prior history of lead poisoning who were seen in the clinic in July and August 1992, and who had not had a lead screen in the previous 6 months (for those aged <36 months) or 12 months (for those aged 36 to 72 months).
Measurements and main results. Fingerstick lead samples were obtained from all children, and those
15 µg/dL (0.72 µmol/L) were confirmed by subsequent venous lead determinations. Twenty-eight percent had blood lead levels
10 µg/dL (0.48 µmol/L), 8% had levels
15 µg/dL (0.72 µmol/L), and 5% had lead levels
20 µg/dL (0.96 µmol/L). According to responses on the questionnaire, 44% were initially classified as low-risk, and 43% were high-risk. In 13% risk could not be determined because one or more items on the questionnaire had not been answered or were answered equivocally, whereas all other items were answered "No." Children for whom risk could not be determined were presumed to be at high risk and were added to that category, resulting in 56% of the study population so designated. The questionnaire was moderately effective in identifying children with elevated lead levels. Seventy percent of children having lead levels
10 µg/dL (0.48 µmol/L) and 82% of children having lead levels
15 µg/dL (0.72
mol/L) had been classified as high-risk by the questionnaire. Children classified as low-risk were very unlikely to have elevated lead levels. Eighty-one percent of low-risk children had lead levels <10 µg/dL, and 97% had lead levels <15 µl/dL. An abbreviated questionnaire using only the first three items from the CDC questionnaire had almost identical effectiveness.
Conclusions. In this clinical setting, in which children are largely urban, poor, and have a moderate to high risk of developing elevated lead levels, the CDC risk assessment questionnaire is effective in identifying children with elevated lead burdens. However, an abbreviated version of the questionnaire may be as effective as the complete questionnaire. Additional questions should be added to the questionnaire to improve its overall sensitivity, and the questionnaire should be tested in other settings to see if it is effective with children having different environmental exposures to lead.
Submitted on June 10, 1993
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. Binns, C. Campbell, M. J. Brown, and for the Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poiso Interpreting and Managing Blood Lead Levels of Less Than 10 {micro}g/dL in Children and Reducing Childhood Exposure to Lead: Recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Pediatrics, November 1, 2007; 120(5): e1285 - e1298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children and Pregnant Women Pediatrics, December 1, 2006; 118(6): 2514 - 2518. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Feinberg and C. K. Cummings Blood Lead Screening Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 2005; 44(7): 569 - 574. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. ozden, H. Issever, G. Gokcay, and G. Saner Longitudinal Analyses of Blood-Lead Levels and Risk Factors for Lead Poisoning in Healthy Children under Two Years of Age Indoor and Built Environment, August 1, 2004; 13(4): 303 - 308. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Binns, S. A. LeBailly, A. R. Fingar, and S. Saunders Evaluation of Risk Assessment Questions Used to Target Blood Lead Screening in Illinois Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): 100 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Kemper, W. C. Bordley, and S. M. Downs Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lead Poisoning Screening Strategies Following the 1997 Guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 1998; 152(12): 1202 - 1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Committee on Environmental Health Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels Pediatrics, June 1, 1998; 101(6): 1072 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Lanphear, R. S. Byrd, P. Auinger, and S. J. Schaffer Community Characteristics Associated With Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children Pediatrics, February 1, 1998; 101(2): 264 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Harvey New Lead Screening Guidelines From The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: How Will They Affect Pediatricians? Pediatrics, September 1, 1997; 100(3): 384 - 388. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Robin, M. Beller, and J. P. Middaugh Statewide Assessment of Lead Poisoning and Exposure Risk Among Children Receiving Medicaid Services in Alaska Pediatrics, April 1, 1997; 99(4): e9 - e9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Casey, C. Wiley, R. Rutstein, and J. Pinto-Martin Longitudinal Assessment for Lead Poisoning Clinical Pediatrics, February 1, 1996; 35(2): 58 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Flaherty Risk of Lead Poisoning in Abused and Neglected Children Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 1995; 34(3): 128 - 132. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||