PEDIATRICS Vol. 93 No. 2 February 1994, pp. 159-163
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaffer, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Weitzman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaffer, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Weitzman, M.

Lead Poisoning Risk Determination in an Urban Population Through the Use of a Standardized Questionnaire

Stanley J. Schaffer MD, MS1, Peter G. Szilagyi MD, MPH1, and Michael Weitzman MD1

1 Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY

Background. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended using a five-item questionnaire at every regular office visit for all children 6 to 72 months of age to identify those at risk of high-dose exposure to lead.

Objective. To determine how well the questionnaire identifies children with elevated lead levels.

Research design. Comparison of results of the questionnaire, which is intended to identify children as being low-risk or high-risk for lead poisoning, with children's blood lead levels.

Setting. A pediatric continuity clinic located in a major teaching hospital in Rochester, NY.

Patients. A consecutive sample of 476 children aged 6 to 72 months without a prior history of lead poisoning who were seen in the clinic in July and August 1992, and who had not had a lead screen in the previous 6 months (for those aged <36 months) or 12 months (for those aged 36 to 72 months).

Measurements and main results. Fingerstick lead samples were obtained from all children, and those ge15 µg/dL (0.72 µmol/L) were confirmed by subsequent venous lead determinations. Twenty-eight percent had blood lead levels ge10 µg/dL (0.48 µmol/L), 8% had levels ge15 µg/dL (0.72 µmol/L), and 5% had lead levels ge20 µg/dL (0.96 µmol/L). According to responses on the questionnaire, 44% were initially classified as low-risk, and 43% were high-risk. In 13% risk could not be determined because one or more items on the questionnaire had not been answered or were answered equivocally, whereas all other items were answered "No." Children for whom risk could not be determined were presumed to be at high risk and were added to that category, resulting in 56% of the study population so designated. The questionnaire was moderately effective in identifying children with elevated lead levels. Seventy percent of children having lead levels ge10 µg/dL (0.48 µmol/L) and 82% of children having lead levels ge15 µg/dL (0.72 gemol/L) had been classified as high-risk by the questionnaire. Children classified as low-risk were very unlikely to have elevated lead levels. Eighty-one percent of low-risk children had lead levels <10 µg/dL, and 97% had lead levels <15 µl/dL. An abbreviated questionnaire using only the first three items from the CDC questionnaire had almost identical effectiveness.

Conclusions. In this clinical setting, in which children are largely urban, poor, and have a moderate to high risk of developing elevated lead levels, the CDC risk assessment questionnaire is effective in identifying children with elevated lead burdens. However, an abbreviated version of the questionnaire may be as effective as the complete questionnaire. Additional questions should be added to the questionnaire to improve its overall sensitivity, and the questionnaire should be tested in other settings to see if it is effective with children having different environmental exposures to lead.

Submitted on June 10, 1993
Accepted on August 31, 1993




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
H. J. Binns, C. Campbell, M. J. Brown, and for the Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poiso
Interpreting and Managing Blood Lead Levels of Less Than 10 {micro}g/dL in Children and Reducing Childhood Exposure to Lead: Recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention
Pediatrics, November 1, 2007; 120(5): e1285 - e1298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
US Preventive Services Task Force
Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children and Pregnant Women
Pediatrics, December 1, 2006; 118(6): 2514 - 2518.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
A. N. Feinberg and C. K. Cummings
Blood Lead Screening
Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 2005; 44(7): 569 - 574.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
T. A. ozden, H. Issever, G. Gokcay, and G. Saner
Longitudinal Analyses of Blood-Lead Levels and Risk Factors for Lead Poisoning in Healthy Children under Two Years of Age
Indoor and Built Environment, August 1, 2004; 13(4): 303 - 308.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
H. J. Binns, S. A. LeBailly, A. R. Fingar, and S. Saunders
Evaluation of Risk Assessment Questions Used to Target Blood Lead Screening in Illinois
Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): 100 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. R. Kemper, W. C. Bordley, and S. M. Downs
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lead Poisoning Screening Strategies Following the 1997 Guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 1998; 152(12): 1202 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Committee on Environmental Health
Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels
Pediatrics, June 1, 1998; 101(6): 1072 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. P. Lanphear, R. S. Byrd, P. Auinger, and S. J. Schaffer
Community Characteristics Associated With Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children
Pediatrics, February 1, 1998; 101(2): 264 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. Harvey
New Lead Screening Guidelines From The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: How Will They Affect Pediatricians?
Pediatrics, September 1, 1997; 100(3): 384 - 388.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. F. Robin, M. Beller, and J. P. Middaugh
Statewide Assessment of Lead Poisoning and Exposure Risk Among Children Receiving Medicaid Services in Alaska
Pediatrics, April 1, 1997; 99(4): e9 - e9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
R. Casey, C. Wiley, R. Rutstein, and J. Pinto-Martin
Longitudinal Assessment for Lead Poisoning
Clinical Pediatrics, February 1, 1996; 35(2): 58 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
E. G. Flaherty
Risk of Lead Poisoning in Abused and Neglected Children
Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 1995; 34(3): 128 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]