1 From the Department of Pediatrics, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Objective. Although many boys are circumcised after the newborn period, there are limited data concerning the proportion of uncircumcised infants who subsequently have the procedure, as well as minimal information about characteristics of this population.
Population. Data and medical records of boys born in Us Army hospitals from 1985 through 1992 were reviewed. General information regarding a portion of the 32 072 boys who were not circumcised during their neonatal hospitalization, but subsequently had the procedure, is reported. In addition, specific details are presented about 476 boys who were circumcised after their birth hospitalization.
Results. The postneonatal circumcision frequency rate of these children increased significantly over this period (P < .0001), particularly after the 1989 American Academy of Pediatrics statement on circumcision. In general, most boys were not circumcised as neonates because of parental choice (55%) or because of a complicated neonatal course (32%). "Sleeve" and "freehand" resection were the most common methods of circumcision (93%), and general anesthesia was used in 91% of the boys. The mean age at postneonatal circumcision was 2.92 years. Common reasons for the ensuing procedure included parental choice (39%), coincidence with other surgery (27%), recurrent balanoposthitis (23%), and urinary tract infections (7%). Complications occurred in 8 of the 476 boys whose specific records were reviewed. These included excessive bleeding (3), malignant hyperthermia (2), aspiration pneumonia (1), large hematoma development (1), and postoperative fever (1).
Conclusions. An increasing number of boys are circumcised beyond the neonatal period, and the procedure performed at this time can be associated with substantial complications. This information may be of use when performing informed-consent counseling for neonatal circumcision.
Key Words: circumcision balanitis posthitis phimosis urinary tract infection
Submitted on April 7, 1993
Accepted on June 2, 1993
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. S. Van Howe Neonatal Circumcision and Penile Inflammation in Young Boys Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 46(4): 329 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Van Howe A Cost-Utility Analysis of Neonatal Circumcision Med Decis Making, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 584 - 601. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Adler, M. S. Ottaway, and S. Gould Circumcision: We Have Heard From the Experts; Now Let's Hear From the Parents Pediatrics, February 1, 2001; 107(2): 20e - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Schoen, C. J. Colby, and G. T. Ray Newborn Circumcision Decreases Incidence and Costs of Urinary Tract Infections During the First Year of Life Pediatrics, April 1, 2000; 105(4): 789 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Task Force on Circumcision Circumcision Policy Statement Pediatrics, March 1, 1999; 103(3): 686 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Van Howe Cost-effective Treatment of Phimosis Pediatrics, October 1, 1998; 102(4): e43 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Herschel, B. Khoshnood, C. Ellman, N. Maydew, and R. Mittendorf Neonatal Circumcision: Randomized Trial of a Sucrose Pacifier for Pain Control Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 1998; 152(3): 279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J Schoen; and R. HITCHCOCK Benefits of newborn circumcision: is Europe ignoring medical evidence? • Commentary Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 1997; 77(3): 258 - 260. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Fleiss, L. M. Robson, A. K.C. Leung, R. S. Van Howe, and G. Weiss A Perspective on Controversies About Neonatal Circumcision Clinical Pediatrics, July 1, 1995; 34(7): 395 - 399. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A PROFILE OF POSTNEONATAL CIRCUMCISION Journal Watch (General), December 14, 1993; 1993(1214): 6 - 6. [Full Text] |
||||