Attitudes and Practices Regarding Analgesia for Newborn Circumcision
1 The Clinical Pharmacology Division, Child Health Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Study objective. To determine attitudes regarding routine use of analgesia for newborn circumcision among primary care physicians in southwestern Ontario.
Design. Questionnaire survey conducted among all family physicians and pediatricians belonging to the London Academy of Medicine. The majority of pediatric primary care in this region is provided by family physicians.
Setting. Metropolitan center in Southwestern Ontario.
Respondents. A questionnaire was mailed to 279 physicians; 171 (61%) responded.
Results. Seventy-four (43%) respondents performed circumcisions. Among physicians performing circumcisions, a minority (17; 24%) used any form of analgesia. The most commonly used analgesic (14; 20%) was oral ethanol. Only 3 (4%) physicians used dorsal penile nerve block. The most common reasons listed for not employing analgesia were lack of familiarity with analgesia use among neonates (56%), lack of familiarity with the technique of dorsal penile block (50%), and concern over adverse effects of analgesic drugs (49%) and regional analgesia (44%). Only a small minority of physicians (7; 12%) responded that they believe that neonates do not feel pain, and 20 (35%) believe that neonates do not remember pain.
Conclusions. Despite evidence that neonates perceive pain and that there is a physiologic stress response to circumcision which can be reduced if analgesia is employed, the vast majority of physicians performing newborn circumcisions either do not employ analgesics or employ analgesics of questionable efficacy. Lack of familiarity with the use of analgesics among neonates and with dorsal penile block in particular are the most common reasons cited for lack of analgesic use. Educational efforts and research into less invasive techniques of analgesia for newborn circumcision are urgently required.
Key Words: circumcision • analgesia • newborn
Submitted on June 4, 1992
Accepted on March 30, 1993
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. S. Van Howe and J. S. Svoboda Neonatal Pain Relief and the Helsinki Declaration J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2008; 36(4): 803 - 823. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. N. Kain, A. A. Caldwell-Andrews, D. M. Krivutza, M. E. Weinberg, S.-M. Wang, and D. Gaal Trends in the Practice of Parental Presence During Induction of Anesthesia and the Use of Preoperative Sedative Premedication in the United States, 1995-2002: Results of a Follow-Up National Survey Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1252 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S C Maurice, J J O'Donnell, and T F Beattie Emergency analgesia in the paediatric population. Part I Current practice and perspectives Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2002; 19(1): 4 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. J. S. Anand and and the International Evidence-Based Group for Neo Consensus Statement for the Prevention and Management of Pain in the Newborn Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2001; 155(2): 173 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. K. Ross, J. B. Eck, and J. D. Tobias Pediatric Regional Anesthesia: Beyond the Caudal Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2000; 91(1): 16 - 26. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Committee on Drugs and Canadian Paediatric Society, Fetus and Newborn Com Prevention and Management of Pain and Stress in the Neonate Pediatrics, February 1, 2000; 105(2): 454 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. G Barr Reflections on measuring pain in infants: dissociation in responsive systems and "honest signalling" Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 1998; 79(2): 152F - 156. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. J. Stang and L. W. Snellman Circumcision Practice Patterns in the United States Pediatrics, June 1, 1998; 101 (6): e5 - e5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. O. Horger III, R. M. Arnett, J. S. Jones, C. Andersson, R. S. Van Howe, C. J. Cold, J. Shechet, S. M. Fried, B. Tanenbaum, J. Lander, et al. Local Anesthesia for Infants Undergoing Circumcision JAMA, April 15, 1998; 279(15): 1169 - 1171. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Herschel, B. Khoshnood, C. Ellman, N. Maydew, and R. Mittendorf Neonatal Circumcision: Randomized Trial of a Sucrose Pacifier for Pain Control Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 1998; 152(3): 279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. R. Howard, F. M. Howard, L. C. Garfunkel, E. A. de Blieck, and M. Weitzman Neonatal Circumcision and Pain Relief: Current Training Practices Pediatrics, March 1, 1998; 101(3): 423 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Somerville, D. M. Alwin, J. E. Scherger, M. S. Katz, D. Keleti, A. Taddio, G. Koren, and T. E. Wiswell Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream for Pain during Circumcision N. Engl. J. Med., August 21, 1997; 337(8): 568 - 570. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Taddio, B. Stevens, K. Craig, P. Rastogi, S. Ben-David, A. Shennan, P. Mulligan, and G. Koren Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream for Pain during Circumcision N. Engl. J. Med., April 24, 1997; 336(17): 1197 - 1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Partridge and S. N. Wall Analgesia for Dying Infants Whose Life Support Is Withdrawn or Withheld Pediatrics, January 1, 1997; 99(1): 76 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
