1 From the Mead Johnson Research Center, Evansville, IN
2 From the St Louis Children's Hospital and Washington University, St Louis, MO
3 From the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
4 From the Riviera Pediatrics, Indianapolis, IN.
Objective. Compare milk-based, ironfortified formulas containing 7.4 and 12.7 mg/L iron and breast-feeding during the first year of life.
Design. Partially randomized, double-blind trial: non-breast-fed infants randomly assigned to receive one of two coded formulas, identical except for iron content; infants discontinuing breast-feeding between 1 and 8 weeks of age randomly assigned to a formula late-start group.
Setting. Five general community pediatric practices in Missouri, Indiana, Illinois, and Pennsylvania.
Participants. Sample of 347 healthy, term infants, enrolled within 1 week after birth; 172 included in statistical analyses.
Outcome measures. Length, weight, and indicators of formula intolerance recorded at clinic visits; formula consumption, bowel movements, stool consistency, and other tolerance indicators recorded by parents on daily and weekly report forms; hemoglobin, hematocrit, and serum ferritin, iron, zinc, and copper measured at 6 and 12 months.
Results. No significant differences between formula-fed groups in growth, attrition, formula consumption, bowel movements, hematocrit, hemoglobin level, and serum iron, zinc, and copper levels (P > .05); first 6-month weight and length changes of the breast-fed group significantly less than in both formula-fed groups (P < .008); serum ferritin level of the formula-fed, high-iron group significantly higher than that of the low-iron and breast-fed groups (P < .008), although all groups' values were normal; no apparent differences between formula groups in formula tolerance and stool characteristics but data were not analyzed statistically.
Conclusions. Milk-based formulas containing either 7.4 or 12.7 mg/L iron support normal growth and iron status of healthy, term, normally fed infants during the first year and both are well tolerated and accepted.
Key Words: infant nutrition infant formula iron zinc copper
Submitted on July 24, 1992
Accepted on December 2, 1992
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Lind, O. Hernell, B. Lonnerdal, H. Stenlund, M. Domellof, and L.-A. Persson Dietary Iron Intake Is Positively Associated with Hemoglobin Concentration During Infancy but Not During the Second Year of Life J. Nutr., May 1, 2004; 134(5): 1064 - 1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Hernell and B. Lonnerdal Iron status of infants fed low-iron formula: no effect of added bovine lactoferrin or nucleotides Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2002; 76(4): 858 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lonnerdal, S. L Kelleher, and E. L Lien Extent of thermal processing of infant formula affects copper status in infant rhesus monkeys Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2001; 73(5): 914 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Singhal, R. Morley, R. Abbott, S. Fairweather-Tait, T. Stephenson, and A. Lucas Clinical Safety of Iron-Fortified Formulas Pediatrics, March 1, 2000; 105(3): 38e - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lloyd, R. J. Halter, M. J. Kuchan, G. E. Baggs, A. S. Ryan, and M. L. Masor Formula Tolerance in Postbreastfed and Exclusively Formula-fed Infants Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): e7 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||