PEDIATRICS Vol. 91 No. 4 April 1993, pp. 842-843
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BLENNOW, M.
Right arrow Articles by GRANSTROM, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BLENNOW, M.
Right arrow Articles by GRANSTROM, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Booster

MARGARETA BLENNOW MD1 and MARTA GRANSTROM MD2

1 Sachs' Children's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
2 Dept of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska Hospital Stockholm, Dept of Vaccine Production, National Bacteriological Laboratory, Stockholm

The editors of Pediatrics have asked us to comment on the study by Pichichero et al,1 because our report of booster vaccination with this vaccine, published in Pediatrics in 1989,2 raised some questions with regard to the safety of the vaccine. The present study, with a design similar to ours, showed different and far more encouraging results: no serious systemic reactions; the same rate of local reactions as in our study but with no (or few) large local reactions in the group of children who received the acellular vaccine for both primary and booster vaccination; and better immunogenicity of the acellular booster in children who received the acellular vaccine only than in the children who received whole-cell vaccine for their primary series (in contrast to the opposite result in our study).

Submitted on January 20, 1993
Accepted on January 20, 1993


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?