PEDIATRICS Vol. 90 No. 6 December 1992, pp. 977-981
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Needleman, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Needleman, H. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Salem Comes to the National Institutes of Health: Notes From Inside the Crucible of Scientific Integrity

Herbert L. Needleman MD1

1 From the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

Many readers of Pediatrics may have only a dim idea of the combative arena in which environmental research is conducted. Probably, very few have had the experience of being investigated for scientific misconduct. My aim in reviewing these two topics is to provide a preventive road map to others and to reveal some inadequacies and inequities in the investigative process. It is necessary, to accomplish this, to be direct and specific. Tact is sacrificed here for the sake of clear instruction.

In 1972 I published 700 words in Nature reporting that Philadelphia inner-city children had higher dentine lead levels than suburban children.1 The paper suggested that the tooth might be a useful marker to estimate body lead burden after exposure had ended. I did not know then that I was taking the first step toward being investigated for scientific misconduct by my university and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Scientific Integrity.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) asked me to present the 1972 tooth lead paper in Amsterdam at an international meeting on lead. I was unprepared by my past attendance at pediatric meetings for what I encountered there. This was no scholarly debate on the toxicology and epidemiology of lead; this was war. The speakers did not behave like academics hoping to embellish their reputations by parading the results of their last 6 months in the lab. These stakes were much higher.

Arrayed against each other were a small and defensive group of environmentalists and health scientists on one side, and on the other the representatives of the gasoline companies, including such formidable entities as EI DuPont, Associated Octel, Dutch Shell, and Ethyl Corporation of America.

Submitted on August 12, 1992
Accepted on August 12, 1992


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
D M Fergusson, J M Boden, and L J Horwood
Dentine lead levels in childhood and criminal behaviour in late adolescence and early adulthood
J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2008; 62(12): 1045 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
H. A. Pearson
The Ever-changing Content of Pediatrics Over Fifty Years
Pediatrics, July 1, 1998; 102(1): 168 - 176.
[Full Text]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
R. A. Deyo, B. M. Psaty, G. Simon, E. H. Wagner, and G. S. Omenn
The Messenger under Attack -- Intimidation of Researchers by Special-Interest Groups
N. Engl. J. Med., April 17, 1997; 336(16): 1176 - 1180.
[Full Text]