PEDIATRICS Vol. 90 No. 5 November 1992, pp. 729-732
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, P. J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, P. J. J.

Ethical Decisions in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: The Dutch Experience

Pieter J. J. Sauer MD1

1 From the Department of Pediatics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Modern technology makes it possible to keep more sick, extremely small, and vulnerable neonates alive. Many neonatologists in the Netherlands believe they should be concerned not only about the rate of survival of their patients, but also about the way the graduates of their care do, in fact, survive beyond the neonatal period. In most cases, we use all available methods to keep newborns alive. However, in some instances there is great concern about the quality of life, if the newborn should survive; here questions do arise about continuing or withholding treatment. In this commentary, I present my impression of the opinions held by a majority of practicing neonatologists in the Netherlands, as well as some personal thoughts and ideas.

Recently, a committee convened by the Ministers of Justice and Health in the Netherlands issued an official report regarding the practice of euthanasia and the rules of medical practice when treatment is withheld.1 In this report of more than 250 pages, only 2 pages focus on the newborn. The following conclusions were made in this small section of the report. In almost one half of the instances of a fatal outcome in a neonatal intensive care unit in the Netherlands, discussions about sustaining or withholding treatment did take place at some stage of the hospital stay. A consideration of the future quality of life was always included in the discussion. The committee agreed with doctors interviewed for the report that there are circumstances in which continuation of intensive care treatment is not necessarily in the best interest of a neonate.

Submitted on April 16, 1992
Accepted on April 17, 1992




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
F Groenendaal, H Lammers, D Smit, and P G J Nikkels
Nitrotyrosine in brain tissue of neonates after perinatal asphyxia
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2006; 91(6): F429 - F433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. A. E. Verhagen and P. J. J. Sauer
End-of-Life Decisions in Newborns: An Approach From the Netherlands
Pediatrics, September 1, 2005; 116(3): 736 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]