PEDIATRICS Vol. 90 No. 1 July 1992, pp. 22-26
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phibbs, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mortensen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phibbs, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mortensen, L.

Back Transporting Infants From Neonatal Intensive Care Units to Community Hospitals for Recovery Care: Effect on Total Hospital Charges

Ciaran S. Phibbs PhD1 and Lynn Mortensen MPH2

1 From the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco; and the Columbia University School of Public Health, New York, N.Y.
2 From the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco

Many neonates are referred to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) for specialized care far from their parents' residence. This distance can add to the stress of the parents and reduce the contact of the parents with their newborn. Small studies have found that back transporting these neonates to hospitals closer to their homes is safe and cost-effective. Despite these findings, the reluctance of many insurers to pay for back transports prevents or delays many back transports. Insurers may not consider the findings of the previous studies to be conclusive, given that the comparisons were between small numbers of neonates back transported and neonates who remained in tertiary care, and the potential for differences in severity of illness between the groups is significant. In this study the effect on hospital charges of back transports was examined by comparing the charges for care in community hospitals with what these charges would have been in a tertiary care center. The advantage of this method is that it avoids case-mix differences between the groups and thus minimizes the potential for small-sample bias. Data were collected for all back transports from a NICU to non-tertiary care centers (n = 90) for a 9-month period. We were able to obtain the itemized bills for the care at community hospitals for 42 of these patients. Each bill was recalculated using the charges for the NICU to determine potential for savings. The average charges for recovery care were about $6200 lower at the community hospital than they would have been at the NICU. When the charges for the back transport are subtracted (mean = $1603), the average net savings are $4,600. These savings are even larger ($6163) for neonates who stayed at the community hospital for more than 7 days.

Key Words: neonatal intensive care unit • transport • neonate • cost

Submitted on August 30, 1991
Accepted on December 30, 1991