PEDIATRICS Vol. 90 No. 1 July 1992, pp. 11-13
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R. L.

Bias and `Overcall' in Interpreting Chest Radiographs in Young Febrile Children

Michael S. Kramer MD1, Renée Roberts-Bräuer MA2, and Robert L. Williams MD3

1 From the Departments of Pediatrics, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2 From the Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
3 From the Departments of Pediatrics, Radiology, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Few studies have examined the diagnostic validity of the examining physician's interpretation of chest radiographs in young febrile children, and none (to our knowledge) the extent to which the "official" (ie, the radiologist's) reading may be biased by access to the examining physician's reading and to other clinical information. The authors studied 287 consecutive chest radiographs obtained in 286 febrile children 3 to 24 months of age without chronic cardiopulmonary disease or known asthma who presented to a children's hospital emergency department between March 1989 and August 1990. The readings by treating pediatricians, official pediatric radiologists, and a "blind" pediatric radiologist were compared. Official radiologists had access to the treating pediatricians' readings and the clinical information provided on the radiography requisition. The blind radiologist knew only that each child was 3 to 24 months of age and febrile, and he was asked to judge the presence or absence of pneumonia. Using the blind radiologist's reading as the "gold standard" for judging validity of the treating physicians' and official radiologists' readings, sensitivity (.677 vs .647), specificity (.828 vs .849), positive predictive value (PPV, .537 vs .571), and kappa index (kgr, .462 vs .475) were quite similar. By contrast, agreement by the treating physicians was considerably higher with the official radiologists' readings as gold standard: sensitivity = .756, specificity = .922, PPV = .795, and kgr = .688. When the treating physician's reading was positive, the official radiologists' positivity rate was much higher than the blind radiologist's (74.4% vs 51.8%, P < .005), sensitivity was high (.884) but specificity was low (.436), PPV was .663, and kgr was .326. When the treating physicians' reading was negative, however, the pattern was reversed: positivity = 8.5% vs 12.8% (P not significant), sensitivity = .240, specificity = .937, PPV = .353, and kgr = .205. Surprisingly, none of the three sets of readings appeared to be influenced by the reporting of clinical signs and symptoms on the radiography requisition. These results indicate that official radiologists are strongly biased by the treating physician's reading. Since such a bias can lead to unnecessary antibiotic treatment and hospital admission, strategies to reduce it should receive high priority.

Key Words: chest radiograph • pneumonia • fever • diagnostic tests

Submitted on August 16, 1991
Accepted on December 5, 1991




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AAP Grand RoundsHome page
A. Fimbres
Can We Predict Occult Pneumonia in Children with Only Fever?
AAP Grand Rounds, July 1, 2007; 18(1): 8 - 9.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
L Brown, T Shaw, and W A Wittlake
Does leucocytosis identify bacterial infections in febrile neonates presenting to the emergency department?
Emerg. Med. J., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 256 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
M E Gatt, G Spectre, O Paltiel, N Hiller, and R Stalnikowicz
Chest radiographs in the emergency department: is the radiologist really necessary?
Postgrad. Med. J., April 1, 2003; 79(930): 214 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. F. Owayed, D. M. Campbell, and E. E. L. Wang
Underlying Causes of Recurrent Pneumonia in Children
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2000; 154(2): 190 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
N. H. Birkebæk, L. K. Hansen, B. Elle, P. E. Andersen, M. Friis, M. Egeblad, K. Damgaard-Pedersen, N. T. Nielsen, and H. Oxhøj
Chest Roentgenogram in the Evaluation of Heart Defects in Asymptomatic Infants and Children With a Cardiac Murmur: Reproducibility and Accuracy
Pediatrics, February 1, 1999; 103(2): 15e - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text]