PEDIATRICS Vol. 89 No. 6 June 1992, pp. 1164-1168
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaudes, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Martone, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaudes, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Martone, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Interdisciplinary Evaluations of Alleged Sexual Abuse Cases

P. Kienberger Jaudes MD1 and M. Martone ACSW1

1 From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, La Rabida Children's Hospital and Research Center, Chicago, IL.

Children who are alleged to have been sexually abused often go through gruelling interrogations to relate their experiences to adults and, even then, most are not viewed as reliable sources of information. The Victim Sensitive Interviewing Program (VSIP) was initiated to decrease the number of interviews endured by a child who allegedly had been sexually abused. The program brought together the disciplines involved in the evaluation of these cases: hospital-based social worker and pediatrician, state child protective agency worker, police, and assistant state's attorney. This team established a protocol for an investigative interview to be conducted by a team member. Pre-VSIP sexual abuse evaluations from 1985 and 1986 (38) were compared with VSIP evaluations (226) from 1987 and 1988. There was no significant difference between the two groups in relation to gender or age of victim, physical symptoms, physical findings, sexually transmitted diseases present, age of perpetrator, or length of stay in hospital. However, there were significant differences between the two groups in (1) number of interviews, 11% pre-VSIP vs 79% VSIP receiving only one interview (P < .001); (2) number of interviewers, 24% pre-VSIP vs 88% VSIP were interviewed by only one interviewer (P < .001); (3) indicated cases of sexual abuse, 68% pre-VSIP vs 88% VSIP (P < .006); (4) identification of the perpetrator, 71% pre-VSIP vs 85% VSIP (P < .035); and (5) charges pressed if perpetrator identified, 33% pre-VSIP vs 60% VSIP (P < .010). It is concluded that interdisciplinary evaluations of alleged sexual abuse in children not only decreased the number of interviews a child must undergo but also increased the likelihood of indicated cases, identification of the perpetrator, and charges being pressed. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that interdisciplinary teams be formed to assess alleged sexual abuse in children.

Key Words: sexual abuse • evaluations • investigation • interdisciplinary coordination

Submitted on June 7, 1991
Accepted on November 8, 1991


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
L. M. Jones, T. P. Cross, W. A. Walsh, and M. Simone
Criminal Investigations of Child Abuse: The Research Behind "Best Practices"
Trauma Violence Abuse, July 1, 2005; 6(3): 254 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
K. Bowen and M. B. Aldous
Medical Evaluation of Sexual Abuse in Children Without Disclosed or Witnessed Abuse
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 1999; 153(11): 1160 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
P. Kienberger Jaudes and D.A. Zimo
Problems for Physicians Dealing with Sexual Abuse Evaluations
Clinical Pediatrics, December 1, 1992; 31(12): 731 - 741.
[PDF]