Birth Spacing and Child Health in Urban Brazilian Children
1 From the Departamento de Medicina Social, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil; Department of Public Health and Policy and Maternal and Child Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England
2 From the Departamento de Medicina Social, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
3 From the Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England
The associations between birth interval and a range of child health outcomes were examined in a population-based cohort of approximately 3500 urban Brazilian children. The effects of several socioeconomic and maternal confounding factors were controlled for in the analyses. Children born after shorter birth intervals (<18 and 18 through 23 months) were disadvantaged with respect to most of the health outcomes when compared with children born after intermediate birth intervals (24 through 35, 36 through 47, and 48 through 71 months). Effects were particularly marked for birth weight, postneonatal mortality, and anthropometric status at mean age 19 months. Children born after a long birth interval (>71 months) also showed some disadvantage for birth weight, perinatal mortality, and infant mortality. However, this group experienced lower risks of hospitalizations during the first 19 months of life and better anthropometric status at mean age 19 months. This study provides data that are scarce from such settings and contributes to the quantification of associations between birth spacing and child health. This information is important in the planning of appropriate intervention strategies.
Key Words: birth intervals birth weight fetal growth retardation infant mortality malnutrition morbidity
Submitted on June 19, 1991
Accepted on September 13, 1991
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Conde-Agudelo, A. Rosas-Bermudez, and A. C. Kafury-Goeta Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA, April 19, 2006; 295(15): 1809 - 1823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G Victora and F. C Barros Cohort Profile: The 1982 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2006; 35(2): 237 - 242. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S M Al-Almaie The pattern and factors associated with child spacing in eastern Saudi Arabia Perspectives in Public Health, December 1, 2003; 123(4): 217 - 221. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Siegel, P. Graves, K. Maloney, J. M. Norris, B. N. Calonge, and D. Lezotte Mortality From Intentional and Unintentional Injury Among Infants of Young Mothers in Colorado, 1986 to 1992 Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 1996; 150(10): 1077 - 1083. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Rawlings, V. B. Rawlings, and J. A. Read Prevalence of Low Birth Weight and Preterm Delivery in Relation to the Interval between Pregnancies among White and Black Women N. Engl. J. Med., January 12, 1995; 332(2): 69 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||









