PEDIATRICS Vol. 88 No. 4 October 1991, pp. 764-769
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lantos, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lantos, J. D.

Pediatrician's Practice Choices: Differences Between Part-time and Full-time Practice

Nancy E. Fritz MD1 and John D. Lantos MD1

1 From the Sections of Ambulatory Pediatrics and Chronic Disease in the Department of Pediatrics, and The Center for Clinical Medical Ethics at The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, and La Rabida Children's Hospital and Research Center, Chicago, Illinois

A national survey was used to study the differences in career and family patterns of pediatricians who work part-time (PT) vs those who work full-time (FT). A questionnaire mailed to 375 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics asked about age, marital status, number of children, type of practice, hours worked in particular duties, and attitudes about their choices. Sixty-five percent (n = 216) of the questionnaires were completed. The mean age of both the PT and FT women was 40 years, and FT men averaged 46 years. Thirty-seven percent of women had worked PT at some point in their careers; 21% were currently working PT. Only 70% of the FT women were married compared with 97% and 95% of PT women and FT men. The FT women had significantly fewer children (mean 1.27, compared with 2.34 for PT women and 2.39 for FT men). Part-time women in academic medicine tended to do little research or administrative work, but they had more teaching responsibilities. Almost all the PT women were happy with their decisions and careers despite the feeling among many that they had made career compromises. Many of the FT pediatricians wanted to work less. It is concluded that many women, particularly those with children, choose PT work in order to combine career and family duties. These choices may lead to different career paths for women pediatricians. By recognizing these different career paths, it may be possible for academic institutions to benefit from the unique contributions that PT women pediatricians can make.

Key Words: women • pediatric practice • health personnel

Submitted on September 4, 1990
Accepted on December 12, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
E. Frank and L. Meacham
Characteristics of Women Pediatricians
Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 2001; 40(1): 17 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
R.-K. R. Chang and N. Halfon
Geographic Distribution of Pediatricians in the United States: An Analysis of the Fifty States and Washington, DC
Pediatrics, August 1, 1997; 100(2): 172 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]